FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

BY ERNEST HEMINGWAY 

Hello everyone....

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by Megha ma'am . In which I'm going to deal about FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS by ERNEST HEMINGWAY. 

For Whom the Bell Tolls is Ernest Hemingway's novel about the Spanish Civil War of the 1930s. It follows Robert Jordan, an American fighting for the leftist Republicans against the Fascist Nationalists. His goal is to blow up a bridge. Along the way, he finds love with Maria. let's discuss in detail about this play. 

For The Bell Tolls:- 

For Whom the Bell Tolls, novel by Ernest Hemingway, published in 1940. The novel is set near Segovia, Spain, in 1937 and tells the story of American teacher Robert Jordan, who has joined the antifascist Loyalist army. Jordan has been sent to make contact with a guerrilla band and blow up a bridge to advance a Loyalist offensive. The action takes place during Jordan’s 72 hours at the guerrilla camp. During this period he falls in love with María, who has been raped by fascist soldiers, and befriends the shrewd but cowardly guerrilla leader Pablo and his courageous wife, Pilar. Jordan manages to destroy the bridge; Pablo, Pilar, María, and two other guerrillas escape, but Jordan is injured. Proclaiming his love to María once more, he awaits the fascist troops and certain death.

Title "For Whom The Bell Tolls" :- 

The title is derived from Meditation 17 of John Donne’s Devotions upon Emergent Occasions (1624). “No man is an island,” Donne observes, “entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main…. Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind, and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”

(Q.1) Critical Analysis of the end of the novel "For Whom the Bell Tolls"

ANS.

In the concluding chapters of "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway crafts a poignant and introspective ending through the character of Robert Jordan. Jordan, isolated in the hills, grapples with the impending certainty of his own death. Hemingway's use of straightforward language emphasizes the inevitability of the toll war takes on individuals. The narrative delves into the deep emotional and philosophical complexities of sacrifice and mortality. Through Jordan's reflections, the novel prompts contemplation on the interconnectedness of human suffering and the broader futility of war.

The sparse prose employed by Hemingway serves as a literary device to underscore the weight of the human cost of conflict. Jordan's acceptance of his fate resonates as a powerful commentary on the harsh realities of war, conveying a sense of resignation to the inevitable toll it extracts. The thematic undercurrent of shared suffering binds individuals, transcending personal narratives and highlighting the universal impact of conflict on the human psyche. Ultimately, the novel's conclusion serves as a somber meditation on the enduring repercussions of war, leaving readers with a contemplative and sobering perspective on the human experience in times of conflict.

In short

In the final part of "For Whom the Bell Tolls," the main character, Robert Jordan, is in the mountains, knowing that he won't survive. Ernest Hemingway, the author, uses simple language to show the heavy price of war. Jordan's acceptance of his fate highlights the theme of sacrifice. Hemingway doesn't use many words, but the emotions are strong, making you feel the weight of war. The story emphasizes how everyone, no matter where they are, shares the pain of conflict. The ending is sad, making you think about the true impact of war on people and society. It leaves you with a feeling of reflection on the cost of human suffering during wartime.

(Q.2) Explain: Robert Jordan as a Typical Hemingway Hero.

ANS.

What is Hemingway Hero ?

- one who exhibits the principles of honor, courage and endurance 

- A man who never accepts defeat after defeat he rises up 

- Fights and maintain his dignity "which in a life of tension and pain make a man a man"

Robert Jordan as a Hemingway Hero.

- Conflict of being in war

- Not agree with Fascist and Republicans but takes job as job

- Against killing people thinks practically

- Sacrifices his life for nation

- Resolves his all metal conflicts at the end - Maria's love helps him to get connected to the world

- Becomes hero & development of his character from starting to ending

Robert Jordan in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" is like other main characters in Hemingway's stories, known as a typical Hemingway hero. He's strong, brave, and doesn't easily show his emotions. Jordan is an expert at what he does, handling explosives in this case, and he's good at it. Hemingway describes him in a simple and direct way, using clear words to paint a picture of his character. Jordan doesn't talk a lot; instead, his actions speak for him, which is a common trait in Hemingway's heroes. 

In the story, Jordan faces tough questions about life and death while in the middle of a war. This reflects Hemingway's interest in exploring deeper meanings in life. The author's writing style, with its straightforward and to-the-point language, makes Jordan a classic example of a Hemingway hero – someone who faces challenges with strength and dignity. Overall, Robert Jordan embodies the qualities that Hemingway admired and often portrayed in his protagonists, making him a fitting example of a typical Hemingway hero.

In short

Robert Jordan, the main character in "For Whom the Bell Tolls," is a lot like other heroes in stories by Ernest Hemingway. He's brave, calm in tough situations, and really good at what he does – blowing things up in this case. Hemingway doesn't use a lot of words to describe him, but you can see Jordan is tough and capable. He thinks about big questions, like why he's doing what he's doing and what life means during a war. This makes him a typical Hemingway hero – someone strong and thoughtful, facing challenges with courage and grace, even in difficult times.

Characters : 

Thank you so much .....

Have a great time.

Transcendentalism

 TRANSCENDENTALISM- AN INDIVIDUAL RELATION WITH NATURE

Hello everyone.....

This blog based on thinking activity based on the most famous American movement Transcendentalism, assigned by Vaidehi ma'am. In which I am going to discuss few questions like , Transcendentalism talks about the Individual's relation with nature, What is Nature for you ? , any Indian/Religion literature which comes up with the same philosophy or we can say that thoughts and at the last example of essays based on same topic.Firstly lets take a basic information about particular topic.

Transcendentalism :- 

Transcendentalism is a philosophical and literary movement that emerged in the 19th century. It emphasizes individual intuition, connection with Nature.Wordsworth and Coleridge ware pioneer of this movement in England. But is America Ralph Waldo Emerson was a consider as a pioneer of this movement.In short Transcendentalism means 'GO BEYOND OR GO ABOVE'. This movement also movement encouraging people to trust their inner selves and connect with nature. Here are some points to which are help us to understand easily.

Here in this image we can see that 

Q.1 Transcendentalists talk about the Individual’s relation with Nature. What is Nature for you? Share your views.

Nature, to me, is like a magnificent symphony of beauty that surrounds us every day. It's the gentle rustle of leaves in the wind, the vibrant colors of a sunrise painting the sky, and the soothing rhythm of waves at the beach. Nature is a magical playground that inspires awe and wonder.When I think about nature, I can't help but be amazed by its simplicity and complexity coexisting harmoniously. It's the home to countless creatures, big and small, each playing a unique role in this grand masterpiece. From the buzzing bees to the towering trees, everything seems to dance together in a graceful choreography.

Nature has this incredible power to rejuvenate the soul. A stroll through a lush green forest or a moment by a serene lake can wash away the stresses of the day. It's a reminder that life, in its purest form, is all around us, ready to embrace us with open arms.The beauty of nature lies in its ability to connect us with something greater than ourselves. It teaches us lessons of resilience, adaptability, and balance. Just like the seasons change, nature reflects the cycles of life, showing us that there is always room for growth, renewal, and transformation.

In our fast-paced world, taking a moment to appreciate nature's wonders becomes a precious gift. So, let's celebrate the simple joys – the warmth of sunlight, the gentle touch of a breeze, and the melody of birdsong. Nature is a constant reminder that life is a breathtaking adventure, and we are fortunate to be a part of it.

Q 2 Transcendentalism is an American Philosophy that influenced American Literature at length. Can you find any Indian/Regional literature or Philosophy that came up with such similar thoughts?

Advaita Vedanta in the 8th century. This philosophy encourages individuals to look beyond the material world and perceive the underlying oneness of all existence. It suggests that the true self (Atman) is not separate from the universal consciousness (Brahman), and realizing this unity leads to spiritual enlightenment.Saints like Kabir, Mirabai, and Tulsidas, among others, used their poetry to convey a sense of spiritual awakening and the importance of an individual's direct connection with the divine. Their writings often contain themes of inner exploration, seeking truth beyond the material world, and finding a profound unity with the divine.

While the cultural and historical contexts differ, the underlying ideas of seeking a deeper connection with the self and the universe, as well as transcending the mundane aspects of life, can be found in both Transcendentalism and certain strands of Indian philosophy and literature.

Movie review : 12th fail

12th Fail: A Triumph Beyond the Grade, Analyzed Through Different Lens

Hello readers...

This blog based on Sunday ready task , a movie review of the movie 12th fail.

Introduction: A Story Woven in Grit and Ink

Vidhu Vinod Chopra's "12th Fail" is not just a film; it's a poignant tapestry woven with threads of struggle, resilience, and ultimately, a triumph that shatters conventional notions of success. Based on the inspiring journey of IPS officer Manoj Kumar Sharma, this biopic ventures beyond the romanticized narrative of the underdog and delves into the raw truth of striving against societal expectations and academic failures. Prepare to embark on a cinematic odyssey rife with emotional highs and lows, a testament to the indomitable human spirit.

• Through the Lens of Bildungsroman:

As Manoj navigates the labyrinthine path towards achieving his UPSC dreams, "12th Fail" unfolds as a classic bildungsroman. We witness his transformation from a young, disillusioned boy burdened by societal scorn to a self-assured leader armed with unwavering determination. Chopra skillfully employs Bildungsroman tropes like coming-of-age struggles, societal pressures, and self-discovery to mirror Manoj's personal and intellectual evolution.

• Beyond the Margins: Education and Social Realities:

"12th Fail" transcends the individual narrative to become a scathing commentary on the Indian education system's rigidity and its tendency to equate academic prowess with success. By juxtaposing Manoj's grit with the system's limitations, the film challenges viewers to re-evaluate our perception of merit and redefine success beyond the confines of a standardized test. Additionally, it sheds light on the socio-economic disparities that perpetuate inequalities and hinder social mobility.

• Thematic Tapestry: Defying Labels and Redefining Dreams

The film's thematic richness is undeniable. At its core lies the powerful idea of defying labels. Manoj, branded a "12th Fail" by society, refuses to be defined by societal stigmas. Instead, he redefines his own path to success, proving that failure, when met with perseverance, can become a stepping stone to greater aspirations. Additionally, the film explores themes of family support, the unwavering strength of love, and the transformative power of education when fueled by a burning desire to make a difference.

• A Comparative Mosaic: "Taare Zameen Par" and the Pursuit of Potential

A comparative analysis with Aamir Khan's "Taare Zameen Par" reveals interesting parallels. Both films delve into the struggles of individuals deemed failures by a system focused on uniformity. Manoj and Ishaan, the protagonist of "Taare Zameen Par," find their learning styles and potential stifled by traditional methods. However, "12th Fail" differs by focusing on societal prejudices against academic failure, while "Taare Zameen Par" tackles the challenges of neurodiversity within the education system. This comparative analysis highlights the multifaceted nature of educational struggles and the need for a more inclusive approach.

• Epilogue: A Resonant Echo Beyond the Silver Screen

"12th Fail" is not just a film; it's a resounding wake-up call. It forces us to confront societal biases, rethink educational priorities, and embrace the power of resilience. Manoj's triumph is not just his own; it's a beacon of hope for anyone who has ever been told they're not good enough. This film stays with you long after the credits roll, its message echoing in the depths of your soul, urging you to rewrite your own definition of success and chase your dreams with undying fervor.

Conclusion:

This review, although longer, adheres to the framework you provided by incorporating theoretical lenses, contextualization, thematic exploration, comparative analysis, and a concluding assessment of the film's impact. Remember, this is just a template, and you can personalize it to your preferred length and writing style.

Thank you so much for your time.

Have a great time.

શબવાહિનીગંગા

 શબવાહિનીગંગા - પારૂલ ખખ્ખર 

Hello readers,

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by dilip sir barad. In which I'm going to deal with the poem named "shabvahiniganga" which is originally written by paral khakhkhar . 

એક અવાજે મડદા બોલ્યાં ‘સબ કુછ ચંગા-ચંગા’

રાજ, તમારા રામરાજ્યમાં શબવાહિની ગંગા.

રાજ, તમારા મસાણ ખૂટયા, ખૂટયા લક્કડભારા,

રાજ, અમારા ડાઘૂ ખૂટયા, ખૂટયા રોવણહારા,

ઘરેઘરે જઈ જમડાંટોળી કરતી નાચ કઢંગા

રાજ, તમારા રામરાજ્યમાં શબવાહિની ગંગા.

રાજ, તમારી ધગધગ ધૂણતી ચીમની પોરો માંગે,

રાજ, અમારી ચૂડલી ફૂટે, ધડધડ છાતી ભાંગે

બળતું જોઈ ફીડલ વગાડે ‘વાહ રે બિલ્લા-રંગા’!

રાજ, તમારા રામરાજ્યમાં શબવાહિની ગંગા.

રાજ, તમારા દિવ્ય વસ્ત્ર ને દિવ્ય તમારી જ્યોતિ

રાજ, તમોને અસલી રૂપે આખી નગરી જોતી

હોય મરદ તે આવી બોલો ‘રાજા મેરા નંગા’

રાજ, તમારા રામરાજ્યમાં શબવાહિની ગંગા. 

Questions: 

1) How dead people can speak?

2) where there is 'Ramrajya' then how there are so many deaths? 

3) If someone is dead then how the team of YAMA 'જમડાટોળી' can dance ?! 

4) How chimneys can shake its head under the influence of evil spirit ? And kind of machines need rest ? 

5) If someone's dead then it's possible that bangles are we see that it's broken but how chest can ? 

6) How burning people can be able to play fiddle  ?

7) If there are numbers of death , then how one man able to live with etiquettes ? And say everything is fine ? 

The main meaning: 

Kind of satirical poem , shows the pandemic period . We have so many deaths during corona time and even we didn't get original number of the dead people on news . The politicians and news channels are constantly showing that less numbers of death and all but in reality we have kind of shabvahiniganga in our nation, in a way number of deaths. Even though our politicians are telling very proudly that  everything is fine . Here poetess wants to express that if there is anyone who can raise their voice against that kind of politicians and came up with reality or not . This kind of message that we get from this poem.

Thanks for reading.

Have a great day.

Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator"

Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" through a frame study

Hello readers ....

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by Dilip sir Barad, in which I'm going to discuss about the Charlie Chaplin's The Great Dictator, frame study of this particular movie.

The Chillingly Enduring Relevance of Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" in a Frame-by-Frame Analysis: 

Charlie Chaplin's 1940 masterpiece, "The Great Dictator", is a scathing satire of fascism and totalitarianism, hilariously skewering Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime. But beyond the slapstick humor and physical comedy lies a film with an unsettlingly prescient message that resonates even more powerfully in today's world.

By examining specific frames from the film, we can see how Chaplin's genius not only captured the essence of his time but also eerily foreshadowed the dangers of the future.

Frame 1: The Barber's Mirror

In the film's opening scene, Chaplin's barber character gazes into a cracked mirror, his reflection distorted and fragmented. This simple image can be interpreted as a metaphor for the shattered state of Europe in the wake of the rise of fascism. It also foreshadows the fractured societies and echo chambers that plague our own digital age.

Frame 2: The Dance of the Globes

In a dream sequence, Chaplin's dictator character playfully spins a globe on his finger, oblivious to the destruction he wreaks. This image perfectly captures the hubris and megalomania of totalitarian leaders, who see the world as their own personal playground. It also resonates with the contemporary issue of climate change, where world leaders often seem to fiddle while the planet burns.

Frame 3: The Ghettos of Tomania

The film's depiction of the Jewish ghettos in Tomania, Chaplin's fictional fascist state, is both heartbreaking and horrifying. The cramped, squalid conditions and the constant threat of violence serve as a stark reminder of the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. This frame is a chilling premonition of the ethnic cleansing and displacement that continue to plague the world today.

Frame 4: The Power of Words

Chaplin's iconic speech at the end of the film, in which he calls for unity and compassion, is a powerful testament to the human spirit's ability to overcome oppression. However, the scene is also undercut by the image of the dictator's soldiers, who stand menacingly in the background. This juxtaposition highlights the constant struggle between hope and despair, between the power of words and the reality of force.

Conclusion

By examining these select frames from "The Great Dictator", we can see how Chaplin's film transcends its historical context to offer a timeless commentary on the human condition. The film's themes of tyranny, oppression, and the fight for freedom are as relevant today as they were in 1940. In a world increasingly divided by fear and hatred, Chaplin's message of hope and unity remains an essential reminder of the power of film to inspire and enlighten.

Call to Action

I encourage you to watch *The Great Dictator* and see for yourself how Chaplin's genius continues to resonate in our contemporary world. Let's use the film's lessons to combat the forces of division and build a more just and equitable future.

Thank you for reading!

I hope this blog is informative and engaging. Please let me know if you have any other questions.

Frame study of modern times by Charlie Chaplin

Frame study in Modern Times by Charlie Chaplin 

Hello everyone.....

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by Dilip sir Barad. In which I'm going to discuss about the frame study in modern times by Charlie Chaplin.

Decoding Chaplin: Examining the Frame in a Digital Age

Charlie Chaplin, the silent film icon, left behind a cinematic legacy built not just on slapstick routines and bowler hats, but on a deep understanding of visual storytelling. Today, in the realm of digital content and rapid-fire video cuts, we can still learn valuable lessons from his meticulous attention to the "frame". Let's delve into the relevance of Chaplin's frame studies in modern times.

Mastering the Canvas:

Chaplin didn't just act in his films; he directed, choreographed, and composed them with the precision of a painter. He viewed the frame as his canvas, carefully arranging every element within it for maximum impact. His use of negative space, framing characters for emphasis, and utilizing depth of field all contributed to a clear and expressive visual language.

Beyond Silence:

The absence of dialogue in silent films forced Chaplin to rely on physical expression and visual cues to convey emotion and narrative. He understood the power of a raised eyebrow, a tilted hat, or a perfectly timed stumble to tell a story. This mastery of silent communication translates wonderfully to modern visual storytelling, where concise visuals and strong body language can often speak louder than words.

Less is More:

In an era of information overload and attention spans measured in seconds, Chaplin's minimalist approach holds even greater value. He understood the power of focusing on a single action or emotion within the frame, allowing the audience to fill in the blanks and engage their imaginations. This focus on simplicity and storytelling through visuals translates perfectly to the world of social media and short-form videos, where every second counts.

Applying the Lessons:

So, how can we, in this age of digital content, utilize Chaplin's frame studies? Here are some takeaways:

Composition matters: Pay attention to the placement of your subjects, the use of space, and the overall balance of the frame. Every element should contribute to the story.

Less is more: Don't overcrowd your visuals. Focus on a single compelling subject or action and let it breathe.

Expression through movement: Utilize body language and facial expressions to tell your story visually. Think of your frame as a stage for your characters.

Engage the audience:Don't be afraid to leave space for interpretation. Allow your viewers to participate in the storytelling process by filling in the gaps with their imaginations.

By studying Chaplin's frame studies, we can learn to harness the power of visual storytelling in a world increasingly dominated by images. Whether you're creating a social media post, a short film, or even a presentation, Chaplin's timeless techniques can elevate your work and connect with your audience on a deeper level. So, dust off your digital canvas, channel your inner Tramp, and start framing your stories with intention!

Remember, the frame is not just a container; it's a portal into another world. What will you show us through yours?

Further Exploration:

Check out the documentary "Chaplin" by Kevin Brownlow and David Gill for a fascinating look at Chaplin's creative process.

Study classic silent films, not just by Chaplin, but by Buster Keaton, Laurel & Hardy, and others, to see how different masters utilized the frame.

Experiment with framing in your own photography, videography, or even graphic design projects. See how different choices impact the viewer's experience.

Let's keep the art of silent storytelling alive in the digital age, one frame at a time!

Thank you so much for reading.

Have a great time.

Criticism-Traditional and Individual Talent

 T.S.Eliot 

Essay: Traditional and Individual Talent- Criticism 

Hello everyone...

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by Dilip sir Barad. In which I'm going to discuss a few points related to T. S. Eliot's essay, named Traditional and Individual Talent. Before discussing our main points let's look apon the basic information about the work. 

Traditional and Individual Talent :- 

"Tradition and the Individual Talent" (1919) is an essay written by poet and literary critic T. S. Eliot. The essay was first published in The Egoist (1919) and later in Eliot's first book of criticism, The Sacred Wood (1920).The essay is also available in Eliot's "Selected Prose" and "Selected Essays".

In more, Often hailed as the successor to poet-critics such as John Dryden, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Matthew Arnold, T.S. Eliot’s literary criticism informs his poetry just as his experiences as a poet shape his critical work. Though famous for insisting on “objectivity” in art, Eliot’s essays actually map a highly personal set of preoccupations, responses and ideas about specific authors and works of art, as well as formulate more general theories on the connections between poetry, culture and society. Perhaps his best-known essay, “Tradition and the Individual Talent” was first published in 1919 and soon after included in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism (1920). Eliot attempts to do two things in this essay: he first redefines “tradition” by emphasizing the importance of history to writing and understanding poetry, and he then argues that poetry should be essentially “impersonal,” that is separate and distinct from the personality of its writer. Eliot’s idea of tradition is complex and unusual, involving something he describes as “the historical sense” which is a perception of “the pastness of the past” but also of its “presence.” For Eliot, past works of art form an order or “tradition”; however, that order is always being altered by a new work which modifies the “tradition” to make room for itself. This view, in which “the past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past,” requires that a poet be familiar with almost all literary history—not just the immediate past but the distant past and not just the literature of his or her own country but the whole “mind of Europe.”

Eliot’s second point is one of his most famous and contentious. A poet, Eliot maintains, must “self-sacrifice” to this special awareness of the past; once this awareness is achieved, it will erase any trace of personality from the poetry because the poet has become a mere medium for expression. Using the analogy of a chemical reaction, Eliot explains that a “mature” poet’s mind works by being a passive “receptacle” of images, phrases and feelings which are combined, under immense concentration, into a new “art emotion.” For Eliot, true art has nothing to do with the personal life of the artist but is merely the result of a greater ability to synthesize and combine, an ability which comes from deep study and comprehensive knowledge. Though Eliot’s belief that “Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality” sprang from what he viewed as the excesses of Romanticism, many scholars have noted how continuous Eliot’s thought—and the whole of Modernism—is with that of the Romantics’; his “impersonal poet” even has links with John Keats, who proposed a similar figure in “the chameleon poet.” But Eliot’s belief that critical study should be “diverted” from the poet to the poetry shaped the study of poetry for half a century, and while “Tradition and the Individual Talent” has had many detractors, especially those who question Eliot’s insistence on canonical works as standards of greatness, it is difficult to overemphasize the essay’s influence. It has shaped generations of poets, critics and theorists and is a key text in modern literary criticism.

1) How would you like to explain Eliot's concept of Tradition? Do you agree with it? What do you understand by Historical Sense?

Partially. I appreciate the emphasis on dialogue and critical engagement. However, the idea of complete "impersonalization" feels restrictive. Personal experience and emotions, when filtered through the historical lens, can also contribute rich layers to art.

Historical Sense:This refers to the ability to perceive the past in its own terms but also recognize its ongoing relevance and impact on the present. It's a nuanced awareness of both continuity and change, allowing the artist to draw upon and contribute to the ongoing conversation across time.

• "The historical sense involves a perception, not only of the pastness of the past but of its presence.":- 

For Eliot, "historical sense" isn't just remembering old stuff, it's hearing the past whispering in the present. This awareness of tradition's ongoing influence allows talented artists to weave those whispers into their work, creating art that speaks not just to their time, but to all time. In a way, it's like taking a traditional family recipe, adding your own twist, but knowing the recipe itself evolves with each generation's touch. That's the beautiful dance between tradition and individual talent.

• This historical sense, which is a sense of the timeless as well as of the temporal, and of the timeless and of the temporal together, is what makes a writer traditional. :- 

Eliot sees "historical sense" as a dual-edged sword, crucial for a writer's "traditional" status. One edge pierces the veil of time, revealing the "timeless" within past works. Great artists aren't just copycats; they recognize universal themes and concerns that transcend historical context, the whispers of humanity echoing across generations. The other edge slices through the present, making the writer acutely aware of their own "temporal" position, the specific cultural and historical forces shaping their voice.

This intricate dance between the timeless and the temporal is what truly defines a traditional writer. They embrace past forms and ideas, not as relics, but as living embers to be fanned into new flames. They don't simply reflect their own time; they engage in a conversation with the past, reinterpreting its whispers through their unique lens, creating art that resonates both now and ever after. It's in this harmonious coexistence of timelessness and temporality, tradition and individuality, that the most enduring works of literature are born.

2) What is the relationship between 'Tradition' and the 'Individual Talent ' according to the poet T.S. Eliot?

Tradition is alredy exiting monument and individual talent to merge in with tradition. Individual Talent does not cut itself away from the tradition can only marginally add a bit. 

• "Some can absorb knowledge, the more tardy must sweat for it. Shakespeare acquired more essential history from Plutarch than most men could from the whole British Museum." :- Eliot demand from his poet as well as from his reader a wide reading. For better understanding he gives example of luminaries like Shakespeare who was not highly educated in the conventional sense but what it is still that Shakespeare array of entire age because he seems to lived his age and absorbed knowledge.We can say here Eliot actually borrowing idea from Matthew Arnold, his essay on function of criticism but in the essay of Function of criticism at the present time mentioned that great epochs of creativity doesn't come often.

• "Honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the poetry." :- In simple words honest criticism means there is no any sensitive appreciation means within the prejudice about poet one should criticize the work. Thus the honest criticism and sensitive appreciation is directed not upon the poet but upon the the work itself.    

                 

3) How would you like to explain Eliot's theory of depersonalization? You can explain with the help of chemical reaction in presence of catalyst agent, Platinum.

Chemical reaction for better understanding about creative writing process

 

So3+ H2o--->(Platinum)H2So4

Here platinum is the medium through process happened and H2So4 came in existence,  the same way in creative process Human mind need medium or content of feeling like suffering, pain,  happiness etc.,  but as in chemical process at result we gets only sulphuric acid and absence of platinum a medium the same way should be in creative writing that writer's own reflection of feelings should not reflect in his/her works. 

• " Poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an escape from emotion; it is not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality."

   We can say that Poetry should impersonal. As Eliot says Poetry is not expression of emotion but poet should away from his personal emotion in his work. Eliot further writes: The poet has, not a "personality" to express, but a particular medium, which is only a medium and not a personality.

4) Write two points on which one can write a critique of 'T.S. Eliot as a critic'.

We can consider Eliot as a critic, according to these points, Modernist sensibility, Cultural tradition, Intellectual rigor , spritual exploration, complexity in literary theory.

Thank you so much for reading.

Have a great time.