109: literary theory and criticism and Indian Esthetic (22402)

 Delve into "Vakrokti" in rasa theory 

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 109: literary theory and criticism and Indian Esthetic (22402) , Sem - 2, 2024.

Topic: Delve into "Vakrokti" in rasa theory 

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 2 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number: 24

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:- Delve into "Vakrokti" in rasa theory 

Paper & subject code:- literary theory and criticism and Indian Esthetic (22402)

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar 

Date of Submission:- 26 March, 2023

• Abstract:

This paper delves into the intertwined concepts of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in Indian poetics, exploring their historical development, theoretical underpinnings, and cultural significance. Vakrokti, the art of indirect expression in poetry, is examined alongside Rasa theory, which elucidates the aesthetic experience evoked by literature. Through an analysis of classical Sanskrit texts and critical interpretations, this study elucidates how Vakrokti serves as a vehicle for evoking Rasas, or emotional responses, in the audience. The paper highlights the deep-rooted historical and cultural significance of these concepts within Indian literary tradition, tracing their evolution from ancient philosophical treatises to contemporary literary discourse. Furthermore, it underscores the philosophical and spiritual dimensions inherent in Vakrokti and Rasa theory, illuminating their enduring relevance in understanding the human condition and fostering aesthetic transcendence. Ultimately, this research contributes to a deeper appreciation and interpretation of Indian literature and aesthetics while inviting further exploration into the universal aspects of human emotion and artistic expression.

• Keywors : Vakrokti , anciant sakskrit texts, macbeth , abhigyanashakuntalam , meghduttam , vairagyashatakm , metaphor , irony , poetic practices. 

• Introduction: 

In the realm of Indian poetics, the concepts of Vakrokti and Rasa theory stand as pillars that illuminate the intricacies of literary expression and the depths of aesthetic experience. Vakrokti, stemming from the Sanskrit roots "vakra" for indirect and "ukti" for expression, embodies the art of veiled communication in poetry, where meaning is conveyed not through direct statements but through suggestion and ambiguity. This nuanced approach to language invites readers to actively engage with the text, unraveling layers of meaning and experiencing the delight of discovery. Complementing Vakrokti is Rasa theory, the philosophical framework that elucidates the emotional essence evoked by literature, particularly poetry and drama. Rooted in the belief that art's primary purpose is to evoke specific emotional responses, Rasa theory identifies a range of fundamental emotions or Rasas, such as love, joy, anger, and fear, which serve as the essence of aesthetic experience. Together, Vakrokti and Rasa theory form the bedrock of Indian literary tradition, shaping the creation, interpretation, and appreciation of poetry for centuries. Their significance extends beyond mere academic discourse, permeating cultural and spiritual spheres, reflecting the interconnectedness of art, emotion, and human experience. As we delve into the historical evolution and cultural significance of Vakrokti and Rasa theory, we embark on a journey to uncover the timeless wisdom and profound insights embedded in Indian literary tradition, inviting us to explore the universal aspects of human emotion and artistic expression.

• Introduction to Vakrokti and Rasa Theory:

Vakrokti and Rasa theory are two fundamental concepts in Indian poetics that have profoundly influenced the understanding and appreciation of literature for centuries. These concepts, deeply rooted in the rich cultural and philosophical traditions of ancient India, continue to shape literary discourse and analysis to this day.

On the other hand, Rasa theory forms the cornerstone of Indian aesthetic philosophy, particularly in the realm of literature. Rasa, literally meaning "juice" or "essence," refers to the emotional essence or aesthetic experience evoked by a work of art, especially poetry and drama. According to Rasa theory, the primary goal of literature is to evoke specific emotional responses, known as Rasas, in the audience. These Rasas, ranging from love and joy to anger and fear, serve as the basis for the aesthetic experience, transcending mere intellectual appreciation to deeply resonate with the human psyche.

The historical and cultural significance of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in Indian literary tradition cannot be overstated. These concepts originated and flourished during the golden age of Sanskrit literature, with scholars and poets like Bharata Muni, Anandavardhana, and Abhinavagupta making significant contributions to their development and refinement. Vakrokti and Rasa theory were not merely academic pursuits but integral aspects of cultural life, shaping the creation, performance, and appreciation of poetry, drama, and other forms of artistic expression.Moreover, Vakrokti and Rasa theory are deeply intertwined with broader philosophical and spiritual traditions in India, reflecting the interconnectedness of art, emotion, and spiritual enlightenment. They provide a framework for understanding the human experience, exploring the depths of human emotion, and transcending mundane existence through aesthetic transcendence.In contemporary times, Vakrokti and Rasa theory continue to inspire scholars, poets, and artists worldwide, transcending cultural and linguistic boundaries to resonate with universal aspects of human experience. Their enduring relevance underscores the timeless wisdom and profound insights embedded in Indian literary tradition, inviting ongoing exploration and appreciation in the ever-evolving landscape of global literature and aesthetics.

• Historical Development: 

The historical development of Vakrokti within Indian literary traditions is a fascinating journey that spans millennia and reflects the rich tapestry of cultural and intellectual exchange in the Indian subcontinent. Vakrokti finds its earliest roots in the ancient Sanskrit texts, where the art of indirect expression was cultivated and refined alongside the burgeoning philosophical and aesthetic inquiries of the time. One of the foundational texts that laid the groundwork for Vakrokti theory is Bharata Muni's "Natyashastra," believed to have been composed around the 2nd century BCE to the 2nd century CE. While "Natyashastra" primarily focuses on dramatic theory, it contains significant insights into the principles of poetic expression, including the use of Vakrokti to evoke emotional resonance in the audience.

The concept of Vakrokti continued to evolve through subsequent centuries, with notable contributions from scholars and poets who further refined its theoretical framework and practical application. Anandavardhana, a Kashmiri scholar who lived in the 9th century CE, made significant strides in elucidating the concept of Dhvani, or suggestion, which is closely related to Vakrokti. Anandavardhana's seminal work, "Dhvanyaloka," explores the profound impact of suggestion on literary appreciation, emphasizing the importance of implied meaning and aesthetic resonance in poetry.

Another luminary in the development of Vakrokti theory is Abhinavagupta, an eminent philosopher, and aesthetician who lived in Kashmir during the 10th century CE. Abhinavagupta's commentary on Anandavardhana's "Dhvanyaloka," known as "Abhinavabharati," provides profound insights into the relationship between Vakrokti and Rasa theory. Abhinavagupta posited that Vakrokti serves as a catalyst for the evocation of Rasas, facilitating a profound aesthetic experience that transcends mere intellectual understanding.

Throughout the medieval period, Vakrokti theory continued to be explored and expounded upon by scholars and poets across different regions of India. Notable figures such as Kuntaka, Mammata, and Visvanatha Kaviraja further enriched the discourse on Vakrokti, each contributing unique perspectives and interpretations to this multifaceted concept. Their works, including Kuntaka's "Vakroktijivita," Mammata's "Kavyaprakasha," and Visvanatha Kaviraja's "Sahityadarpana," serve as invaluable repositories of Vakrokti theory, offering profound insights into the art of poetic expression and its relationship to aesthetic experience.

In modern times, scholars continue to engage with Vakrokti theory, exploring its relevance in contemporary literary criticism and creative writing. While the theoretical framework may have evolved over the centuries, the enduring legacy of Vakrokti endures as a testament to the timeless wisdom and profound insights embedded in Indian literary tradition.

• Conceptual Framework: 

The relationship between Vakrokti and Rasa theory in Indian poetics is symbiotic, with Vakrokti serving as a powerful vehicle for evoking Rasas, or emotional responses, in poetry. Vakrokti, the art of indirect expression, employs various rhetorical devices and figurative language techniques to convey meaning in a subtle, suggestive manner. These devices include metaphor, irony, paradox, suggestion, and wordplay, among others. By utilizing Vakrokti, poets create layers of meaning within their poems, inviting readers to engage actively with the text and uncover its deeper significance.

Rasa theory, on the other hand, posits that the primary goal of literature is to evoke specific emotional responses in the audience. According to Rasa theory, poetry and other forms of art are vehicles for transporting the audience from mundane reality to a heightened emotional state, transcending the boundaries of time and space. The Rasas, or fundamental emotions, serve as the essence of aesthetic experience, ranging from love and joy to anger and fear.

Vakrokti serves as a potent tool for evoking Rasas by infusing poetry with layers of meaning and emotional resonance. Through the use of metaphor, for example, a poet can evoke a sense of longing or desire, stirring the reader's emotions and transporting them into the world of the poem. Similarly, irony can evoke feelings of amusement or irony, while paradox can create a sense of wonder or contemplation.

Analyzing the different types of Vakrokti provides insight into their respective effects on Rasa. For instance, Upama, or metaphor, relies on the comparison between two seemingly unrelated objects or ideas to evoke a specific emotional response. By juxtaposing disparate elements, metaphor creates a sense of resonance and connection, allowing readers to experience the emotional depth of the poem.

Similarly, Virodhita, or irony, employs contradiction and incongruity to evoke feelings of amusement or satire. Irony invites readers to reflect on the gap between appearance and reality, challenging their perceptions and eliciting an emotional response.

Paradox, another type of Vakrokti, involves the juxtaposition of seemingly contradictory ideas to create a sense of wonder or contemplation. Paradox invites readers to delve deeper into the complexities of the poem, stimulating intellectual and emotional engagement.

Overall, Vakrokti and Rasa theory are intricately intertwined, with Vakrokti serving as a vehicle for evoking Rasas in poetry. By employing various rhetorical devices and figurative language techniques, poets create layers of meaning and emotional resonance, inviting readers to embark on a journey of aesthetic experience and emotional transcendence.

Example: 

Abhijnanasakuntalam" by Kalidasa:

In "Abhijnanasakuntalam," Kalidasa masterfully employs Vakrokti to convey subtle emotions and evoke aesthetic resonance. One notable example of Vakrokti from the play is found in Act 1, Verse 27, where King Dushyanta, upon first encountering Shakuntala, is captivated by her beauty. He says:Sanskrit:

"तत्रैव संस्कृतां वाचं प्रारुह्य धरणीतले।

प्राविशद्गौरवो राजा योगवीरस्य दर्शनात्॥"

English Translation:

"There, on the very ground, planting the accents of the Sanskrit tongue,

Entered the king, abashed before the majesty of the Yogi's daughter."In this verse, the king's response to Shakuntala's presence is expressed indirectly. Instead of stating his admiration outright, he describes himself as being "abashed before the majesty of the Yogi's daughter." This indirect expression adds depth to the king's emotions, conveying a sense of awe and reverence for Shakuntala's beauty and spiritual aura.

"Macbeth" by William Shakespeare:

Shakespeare's "Macbeth" is replete with examples of Vakrokti, particularly in the portrayal of Macbeth's inner turmoil and descent into madness. One striking instance occurs in Act 5, Scene 5, where Macbeth reflects on the futility and emptiness of life. He exclaims:

"Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player

That struts and frets his hour upon the stage

And then is heard no more. It is a tale

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,

Signifying nothing."

In this passage, Shakespeare employs metaphor and paradox to convey the existential despair and nihilism that consume Macbeth. The comparison of life to "a walking shadow" and "a tale told by an idiot" illustrates the fleeting and ultimately meaningless nature of human existence. Through Vakrokti, Shakespeare plunges the audience into the depths of Macbeth's despair, inviting reflection on the larger themes of mortality and the human condition.

• Theoretical perspective: 

Theoretical perspectives on Vakrokti and Rasa theory have evolved over centuries, encompassing a wide range of interpretations and debates within Indian literary criticism and scholarship. Classical Sanskrit treatises, commentaries by renowned scholars, and modern scholarly interpretations offer diverse insights into these concepts, shaping their understanding and application in literary analysis.

Classical Sanskrit Treatises:

Classical Sanskrit treatises such as Bharata Muni's "Natyashastra" and Anandavardhana's "Dhvanyaloka" lay the foundation for Vakrokti and Rasa theory. Bharata Muni's "Natyashastra" provides a comprehensive framework for dramatic theory, elucidating the principles of poetic expression and performance. Anandavardhana's "Dhvanyaloka" explores the concept of Dhvani, or suggestion, as the central mechanism for evoking Rasa in poetry. These treatises offer foundational insights into the aesthetic principles underlying Vakrokti and Rasa theory.

Commentaries by Scholars:

Commentaries by eminent scholars such as Abhinavagupta, Mammata, and Visvanatha Kaviraja further enrich the discourse on Vakrokti and Rasa theory. Abhinavagupta's "Abhinavabharati" provides profound insights into the relationship between Vakrokti and Rasa, emphasizing the role of suggestion in eliciting emotional responses in poetry. Mammata's "Kavyaprakasha" offers detailed analyses of different types of Vakrokti and their effects on Rasa, while Visvanatha Kaviraja's "Sahityadarpana" explores the practical application of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in literary composition and criticism.

Modern Scholarly Interpretations:

Modern scholars have continued to engage with Vakrokti and Rasa theory, offering new perspectives and interpretations informed by contemporary literary theory and criticism. Scholars such as K. Krishnamoorthy, K. K. Chakravarty, and A. K. Ramanujan have contributed to the study of Vakrokti and Rasa theory from interdisciplinary and comparative perspectives, drawing connections between Indian poetics and Western literary traditions. Additionally, feminist scholars like Rukmini Bhaya Nair have explored the gendered dimensions of Vakrokti and Rasa theory, interrogating traditional interpretations and offering alternative readings that foreground marginalized voices and perspectives.

Debates and Controversies:

Debates and controversies surrounding Vakrokti and Rasa theory revolve around issues such as the primacy of suggestion versus explicit expression, the universality versus cultural specificity of Rasas, and the relevance of these concepts in contemporary literary criticism. Critics have questioned the applicability of Vakrokti and Rasa theory to non-Indian literary traditions and the extent to which these concepts can be adapted to analyze modern and postmodern literature. Additionally, debates persist regarding the interpretation of specific texts and the validity of competing scholarly interpretations, reflecting the ongoing dynamism and complexity of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in literary criticism.

• Example of Vakrokti: 

Kalidasa's "Meghaduta":

In Kalidasa's "Meghaduta," a masterpiece of classical Sanskrit poetry, we encounter several in stances of Vakrokti that enrich the aesthetic experience and evoke various Rasas. One notable example is found in the opening verses of the poem, where the lovelorn Yaksha addresses a passing cloud, instructing it to carry a message to his beloved. The Yaksha says:Sanskrit:

"कामार्तस्य क्रीडामूलनिधिना गन्धर्वविद्यापरिणामवशेन।

विद्योतमाना उपलक्षयेयुः सामान्यभूयः प्रसवात्पयोधेः॥"

English Translation:

"O cloud, by the transformational power of the Gandharva's art, she, afflicted with love's wound, will soon be illumined; from the water-lily's receptacle, she will rise as if from a second birth."In this verse, the Yaksha employs metaphorical language to describe the transformative effect of his message on his beloved. The comparison of his beloved to a water-lily rising from a receptacle evokes a sense of beauty and purity, while the anticipation of her enlightenment imbues the verse with a sense of hope and longing, evoking the Rasa of love.

Bhartrihari's "Vairagya Shataka":

Bhartrihari, a renowned Sanskrit poet and philosopher, explores themes of detachment and renunciation in his "Vairagya Shataka." One striking example of Vakrokti in this work is found in Verse 10, where Bhartrihari reflects on the ephemeral nature of worldly attachments. He says:Sanskrit:

"या नित्या नैव वित्तैर्विभूषिता मौन्जीवः श्वेतशिरः।

वहन्ति साधवो धातुर्महिषीं प्रायेण तां वहन्ति॥"

English Translation:

"That pearl (of the heart) which is never adorned with wealth, which the white-lotus-like silent sages carry, almost always carries it."Here, Bhartrihari employs metaphorical language to convey the idea that true inner wealth, symbolized by the pearl of the heart, remains untouched by material possessions. The comparison of the pearl to a silent sage and the implication that it is almost always carried by them evokes a sense of detachment and serenity, contributing to the Rasa of renunciation.

Other Classical Sanskrit Poets:

Other classical Sanskrit poets such as Magha, Bhavabhuti, and Dandin also employ Vakrokti techniques in their works to evoke different Rasas. For example, Magha's "Shishupala Vadha" and Bhavabhuti's "Uttararamacharita" are replete with examples of metaphor, irony, and paradox that contribute to the aesthetic experience and evoke Rasas such as heroism, compassion, and tragedy.

• Comparative Analysis:

Comparing Vakrokti and Rasa theory with similar concepts in Western literary theory, such as metaphor, irony, and catharsis, reveals both similarities and differences in their approaches to understanding literary aesthetics.

Metaphor:

In both Indian poetics and Western literary theory, metaphor plays a crucial role in conveying meaning and enriching the aesthetic experience.

While metaphor in Western theory often focuses on direct comparison between two dissimilar objects or ideas, Vakrokti encompasses a broader range of indirect expressions that may include metaphorical language but also extends to other rhetorical devices like irony and paradox.

Vakrokti emphasizes suggestion and ambiguity, inviting readers to engage actively with the text and uncover deeper layers of meaning, whereas Western metaphor tends to be more explicit in its conveyance of meaning.

Irony:

Irony is another concept that is prevalent in both Indian and Western literary traditions.

In Western literary theory, irony often involves the use of language to convey the opposite of what is actually meant, creating a sense of incongruity or contradiction.

In Vakrokti, irony is one of the many rhetorical devices employed to convey indirect meaning and evoke emotional resonance. However, Vakrokti's approach to irony may differ in its subtlety and complexity, with layers of irony often intertwined with other forms of indirect expression.

Catharsis:

Catharsis, a concept famously associated with Aristotle's "Poetics," refers to the purging or cleansing of emotions through the experience of art, particularly tragedy.

In Rasa theory, the concept of catharsis aligns closely with the idea of evoking specific emotional responses, known as Rasas, in the audience. However, Rasa theory goes beyond catharsis by delineating a broader range of emotional experiences and emphasizing the aesthetic enjoyment of these emotions.

While catharsis focuses primarily on the emotional impact of literature on the audience, Rasa theory incorporates a more holistic understanding of aesthetic experience, encompassing not only emotional but also intellectual and spiritual dimensions.

• Contemporary Relevance:

The relevance of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in contemporary literary criticism and creative writing extends far beyond their historical and cultural origins, as these concepts continue to inform and enrich the interpretation and appreciation of poetry across different cultures and languages.

Understanding and Analyzing Poetry:

Vakrokti and Rasa theory provide valuable frameworks for understanding and analyzing poetry in contemporary literary criticism. Their emphasis on indirect expression, suggestion, and emotional resonance offers insights into the complexities of poetic language and the nuances of aesthetic experience.

Contemporary literary critics often draw upon Vakrokti and Rasa theory to elucidate the deeper layers of meaning and emotional impact in poetry, enriching interpretations and fostering deeper appreciation among readers.

Creative Writing and Poetic Practice:

In creative writing, Vakrokti and Rasa theory serve as guiding principles for poets seeking to evoke specific emotional responses and create resonant, multi-layered texts.

Poets draw upon the techniques of Vakrokti, such as metaphor, irony, and paradox, to infuse their work with richness and depth, inviting readers to engage actively with the text and uncover its deeper significance.

Similarly, Rasa theory informs poets' understanding of the emotional impact of their work, guiding them in crafting poetry that resonates with readers on a profound aesthetic level.

Cross-Cultural and Transnational Perspectives:

While rooted in Indian literary tradition, Vakrokti and Rasa theory have transcended cultural and linguistic boundaries to influence the interpretation and appreciation of poetry across different cultures and languages.

Scholars and poets worldwide draw upon Vakrokti and Rasa theory to explore the universal aspects of human experience and artistic expression, fostering cross-cultural dialogue and appreciation of diverse literary traditions.

By recognizing the relevance of Vakrokti and Rasa theory in a global context, scholars and poets contribute to the enrichment and revitalization of these concepts, ensuring their continued resonance and vitality in contemporary literary discourse.

• Conclusion: 

In conclusion, the exploration of Vakrokti and Rasa theory reveals the profound depth and enduring relevance of these concepts in literary theory and creative expression. Originating in classical Sanskrit poetics, Vakrokti, the art of indirect expression, and Rasa theory, the theory of aesthetic experience, offer invaluable frameworks for understanding and analyzing literature across cultures and languages. From their historical development and theoretical underpinnings to their practical applications in contemporary literary criticism and creative writing, Vakrokti and Rasa theory continue to inspire scholars, poets, and readers worldwide. Their insights into the nuances of poetic language, the evocation of emotion, and the transcendence of cultural boundaries underscore their timeless significance in the exploration of human experience and artistic expression. As we engage with these concepts, we embark on a journey of discovery and appreciation, enriching our understanding of literature and deepening our connection to the beauty and power of poetic expression. In an ever-evolving literary landscape, Vakrokti and Rasa theory stand as pillars of wisdom, inviting us to delve deeper into the mysteries of language, emotion, and aesthetic experience.

• References: 

• Brooks, Cleanth. “Irony and ‘Ironic’ Poetry.” College English, vol. 9, no. 5, 1948,

pp. 231–37. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/371944. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

• Hegde, Suryanarayana. The Concept of Vakrokti in Sanskrit Poetics: A

Reappraisal. Readworthy, 2009.Patwardhan, M. V. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, vol. 52,

no. 1/4, 1971, pp. 233–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41688727.

Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

• Priestley, J. B. Jstor Home, National Council of Teachers of English, Sept. 1929,

www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/803281. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

Thank you so much for reading....

Have a great time.

Words count:3560

Images: 6

110: History of English Literature -From 1900 to 2000.

 A Comparative Study of Existentialism, Absurdism, and Nihilism: Exploring Philosophical Perspectives on Meaning and Existence

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 110-tory of English Literature -From 1900 to 2000  , Sem - 2, 2024.

Topic: A comparative analysis of Existentialism, Absurdism and Nihilism 

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 2 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number: 24

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:- A comparative analysis of Existentialism, Absurdism and Nihilism 

Paper & subject code:- History of English Literature -From 1900 to 2000.

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar 

Date of Submission:- 26 March, 2023

• Abstract:

This paper presents a comparative study of three influential philosophical perspectives: existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism. Each perspective offers unique insights into the nature of existence, the search for meaning, and human response to the inherent challenges of life. Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom and responsibility, advocating for the creation of personal meaning through authentic choices and actions. Absurdism, in contrast, confronts the absurdity and irrationality of existence, advocating for a defiant embrace of life's absurdity and the pursuit of meaning in spite of it. Nihilism, meanwhile, asserts the ultimate meaninglessness of existence and rejects traditional notions of value or purpose. Through an exploration of the core tenets, perspectives on meaning and existence, responses to the absurd, and critiques, this paper offers a nuanced understanding of these philosophical perspectives and their intersections. By examining their relevance in contemporary society, this study contributes to ongoing discussions about the human condition, morality, and the quest for meaning in an indifferent universe.

• Introduction:

In the vast landscape of philosophical inquiry, few concepts are as central to the human experience as the search for meaning and understanding in existence. Among the myriad of perspectives that have emerged throughout history, existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism stand out as influential frameworks that offer distinct insights into the fundamental questions of life's purpose, value, and significance. Stemming from different historical contexts and philosophical traditions, these perspectives provide contrasting lenses through which to interpret the human condition and navigate the complexities of existence.Existentialism, with its roots in 19th and 20th-century European philosophy, places a profound emphasis on individual freedom, responsibility, and authenticity. It contends that human beings are thrust into a world devoid of inherent meaning or purpose, yet possess the capacity to create meaning through their choices and actions. In the face of an indifferent universe, existentialism champions the individual's quest for self-definition and the forging of personal values amidst the existential angst of existence.Absurdism, closely associated with the writings of Albert Camus and influenced by existential thought, takes a more radical stance on the absurdity of human existence. Rejecting the notion of a rational or meaningful universe, absurdism posits that life is inherently devoid of inherent purpose or rationality. However, rather than succumbing to despair or nihilism, absurdism advocates for a defiant rebellion against the absurdity of existence. Through acts of creative defiance and passionate engagement with life's absurdity, individuals can find meaning and fulfillment in the face of an inherently irrational world.Nihilism, in contrast, represents a more radical departure from traditional philosophical frameworks by asserting the utter meaninglessness and insignificance of existence. Originating in the 19th century, nihilism challenges the validity of established moral, religious, and philosophical beliefs, arguing that life lacks any inherent value or purpose. Embracing a stance of radical skepticism, nihilism confronts the human condition with an uncompromising acknowledgment of the void at the heart of existence.

This paper seeks to explore and compare these three philosophical perspectives – existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism – in order to shed light on their respective contributions to our understanding of meaning and existence. By examining their historical roots, core tenets, perspectives on meaning, responses to the absurd, and critiques, we aim to provide a comprehensive analysis of these philosophical frameworks and their implications for contemporary thought. In doing so, we hope to illuminate the ongoing relevance of existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism in navigating the complexities of the human experience and grappling with the perennial questions of existence in an indifferent universe.

• Historical Background:

Existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism have all emerged as influential philosophical movements that have significantly shaped our understanding of human existence and the nature of reality. Each of these movements has distinct origins, key figures, and evolutionary trajectories, which have been marked by a rich tapestry of ideas and concepts.

Existentialism:

Origins and Key Figures: Existentialism finds its roots in the 19th and 20th centuries, primarily in response to the existential crisis brought about by modernity. Key figures include Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Simone de Beauvoir. Kierkegaard is often considered the "father of existentialism" for his exploration of individual subjectivity, faith, and the quest for authenticity.

Evolution: Existentialism evolved from a diverse range of philosophical, literary, and religious influences, including German idealism, French phenomenology, and Christian existentialism. It reached its peak of popularity in the mid-20th century, particularly in the aftermath of World War II, as thinkers grappled with the existential challenges of the modern world.

Influential Works and Concepts: Key works include Kierkegaard's "Fear and Trembling," Nietzsche's "Thus Spoke Zarathustra," Heidegger's "Being and Time," Sartre's "Being and Nothingness," and de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex." Central concepts include existential angst, freedom, authenticity, and the absurdity of human existence.

Absurdism:

Origins and Key Figures: Absurdism emerged in the mid-20th century, primarily through the works of French-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus. Influenced by existentialism and his experiences of the absurdity of life, Camus articulated the central tenets of absurdism in works such as "The Myth of Sisyphus" and "The Stranger."

Evolution: Absurdism developed as a response to the existentialist emphasis on individual freedom and meaning-making. Camus rejected the notion of a rational or meaningful universe, instead embracing the absurdity and futility of human existence. Absurdism reached its peak of influence in the post-war period, particularly in the realm of literature and theatre.

Influential Works and Concepts: Camus's "The Myth of Sisyphus" is a seminal work that explores the absurdity of human existence and the philosophical implications of embracing life's absurdity. Concepts such as the "absurd hero," the "philosophy of the absurd," and the "revolt against the absurd" are central to Camus's thought.

Nihilism:

Origins and Key Figures: Nihilism traces its roots back to 19th-century Russian literature and philosophy, particularly through the writings of Fyodor Dostoevsky and Friedrich Nietzsche. While Dostoevsky explored nihilistic themes in works such as "Notes from Underground," Nietzsche famously proclaimed the "death of God" and critiqued traditional moral, religious, and philosophical values.

Evolution: Nihilism gained prominence as a radical critique of established beliefs and institutions, challenging the foundations of Western thought and culture. It underwent various iterations, from passive nihilism, which denies the existence of meaning, to active nihilism, which seeks to create new values and perspectives.

Influential Works and Concepts: Nietzsche's "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" and "Beyond Good and Evil" are seminal texts that explore nihilistic themes and concepts such as the "will to power," the "eternal recurrence," and the "Übermensch." Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" and "Crime and Punishment" also grapple with nihilistic themes and the consequences of a world without meaning.

• Perspective on meaning and existence: 

Existentialism:

Human Agency and the Creation of Personal Meaning through Choices and Actions: Existentialism emphasizes the significance of human agency in creating meaning and purpose in life. Individuals are viewed as active agents who have the freedom to make choices and take responsibility for their actions. Through their choices and actions, individuals can shape their own lives and create personal meaning.

Struggle with the Inherent Absurdity of Existence while Striving for Authenticity and Self-Definition: Existentialists acknowledge the inherent absurdity and unpredictability of human existence in an indifferent universe. Despite this recognition, existentialism encourages individuals to confront the absurdity of life with courage and authenticity. By embracing the challenges of existence and striving for self-definition, individuals can transcend the absurdity and find meaning in their own existence.

Absurdism:

Recognition of the Inherent Absurdity and Futility of Human Existence: Absurdism acknowledges the inherent absurdity and irrationality of human existence, where the search for meaning is ultimately futile. In an indifferent universe devoid of inherent purpose or rationality, human endeavors can appear meaningless and absurd.

Advocacy for Embracing Life's Absurdity and Finding Meaning in Defiance of It: Despite the absurdity and futility of existence, absurdism advocates for embracing life in all its chaotic and unpredictable manifestations. Rather than succumbing to despair or nihilism, individuals are encouraged to find meaning through acts of defiance and rebellion against the absurd. By embracing the absurdity of existence, individuals can find liberation and authenticity in living passionately and authentically.

Nihilism:

Assertion of the Meaninglessness and Insignificance of Human Existence: Nihilism asserts that human existence is ultimately devoid of inherent meaning or significance. In a fundamentally indifferent universe, human endeavors and aspirations are viewed as ultimately futile and insignificant.

Rejection of the Search for Meaning and Acceptance of a Fundamentally Indifferent Universe: Nihilism rejects the pursuit of meaning or purpose in life, viewing such endeavors as futile and illusory. Instead, nihilism advocates for an acceptance of the inherent meaninglessness of existence and a recognition of the indifferent and arbitrary nature of the universe. In embracing nihilistic freedom, individuals can liberate themselves from the burden of searching for meaning and live authentically in accordance with the absence of inherent value or purpose.

• Response to the absurd: 

In response to the inherent absurdity of existence, existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism each propose distinct approaches. Existentialism advocates for the pursuit of personal significance through individual choices and commitments. Individuals are encouraged to embrace subjective meaning-making and create their own values, thereby asserting their autonomy and authenticity in navigating the absurdity of life. Absurdism, on the other hand, promotes living authentically in the face of the absurd. Rather than despairing or resigning oneself to nihilism, absurdists engage with life's absurdity through acts of rebellion, creativity, and passion. By embracing the chaos and irrationality of existence, individuals can find liberation and meaning in defiance of the absurd. Nihilism, however, takes a more radical stance by advocating for the acceptance of the absurdity and meaninglessness of existence. In embracing nihilistic freedom and acknowledging the absence of inherent value or purpose, nihilists reject the pursuit of meaning altogether. Instead, they find solace in the recognition of life's inherent meaninglessness, freeing themselves from the burden of searching for purpose in an indifferent universe. These responses to the absurd reflect the diverse ways in which individuals confront and navigate the challenges of existence, each offering a unique perspective on the human condition and the quest for meaning in a world devoid of inherent significance.

Critiques and Intersections:

Existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism each have their own set of criticisms and limitations. Existentialism, while emphasizing individual freedom and authenticity, has been criticized for its potential to lead to moral relativism and subjective interpretations of truth. Critics argue that existentialism's focus on personal meaning-making may neglect broader social and ethical considerations, leading to a solipsistic worldview. Absurdism, while offering a compelling response to the absurdity of existence, has been criticized for its potential to lead to existential despair or existentialism's search for meaning and authenticity. Critics argue that absurdism's emphasis on rebellion and defiance may overlook the importance of ethical principles and communal values. Nihilism, while providing a radical critique of established beliefs and institutions, has been criticized for its tendency towards nihilistic pessimism and existential nihilism, which can lead to apathy and moral disengagement.

Despite their differences, existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism intersect in various ways. Existentialism and absurdism both confront the absurdity of existence and advocate for individual autonomy and authenticity. While existentialism seeks to create personal meaning through choices and actions, absurdism embraces life's absurdity and advocates for defiance in the face of meaninglessness. Nihilism intersects with both existentialism and absurdism in its rejection of objective meaning or value in existence. While existentialism and absurdism may strive to create personal meaning or defy the absurd, nihilism accepts the inherent meaninglessness of existence and embraces nihilistic freedom.

These philosophical perspectives inform contemporary debates on meaning, morality, and existence in profound ways. Existentialism's emphasis on individual freedom and responsibility informs discussions on autonomy, personal agency, and moral decision-making. Absurdism's recognition of life's absurdity informs debates on existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism, each offering unique insights into the human condition and the quest for meaning in a world devoid of inherent significance. Nihilism's critique of established beliefs and institutions informs discussions on ethics, politics, and social justice, challenging conventional notions of meaning and value. Overall, these perspectives continue to shape contemporary discourse on existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism, offering diverse insights into the complexities of human existence and the search for meaning in an indifferent universe.

• Conclusion: 

In concluding our comparative study of existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism, we have delved into the intricate nuances of each philosophical perspective and their profound implications for understanding the human condition. From tracing their historical origins to examining their core tenets, responses to the absurd, critiques, and intersections, we have uncovered valuable insights into the complexities of existence. Existentialism's emphasis on individual freedom, responsibility, and the pursuit of personal meaning resonates deeply in our contemporary world, offering a framework for navigating the challenges of autonomy and authenticity. Absurdism's defiant embrace of life's inherent absurdity challenges traditional notions of meaning and advocates for a courageous engagement with the chaos of existence. Nihilism's radical rejection of objective meaning or value in life confronts us with the stark reality of an indifferent universe, prompting profound reflections on the nature of reality and human existence. Despite their differences, existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism intersect in their shared confrontation with the absurdity of existence, each offering unique insights into the human condition. In modern society, these philosophical perspectives continue to hold relevance and significance, informing contemporary debates on meaning, morality, and the quest for authenticity. Looking ahead, there are important implications for future research and philosophical inquiry as we strive to deepen our understanding of the complexities of human experience and the search for meaning in an ever-changing world. As we navigate the uncertainties of life, existentialism, absurdism, and nihilism serve as guiding beacons, reminding us of the importance of confronting the absurd with courage, authenticity, and a commitment to living meaningfully in the face of uncertainty.

• Refrences: 

1. Magnus, Bernd. “Nihilism, Reason, and ‘The Good.’” The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 25, no. 2, 1971, pp. 292–310. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20125996. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

2. Pritchard, Duncan. “Absurdity, Angst, and the Meaning of Life.” The Monist, vol. 93, no. 1, 2010, pp. 3–16. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41419194. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

3. Wild, John. “Existentialism as a Philosophy.” The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 57, no. 2, 1960, pp. 45–62. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2022807. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

Thank you so much for reading....

Have a great time.

Word count: 2470

Images:1

108: American literature (22401)

 Exploring Narrative Style in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" by Ernest Hemingway

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 108 - American literature , Sem - 2, 2024.

Topic: Exploring Narrative Style in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" by Ernest Hemingway

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 2 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number: 24

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:- Exploring Narrative Style in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" by Ernest Hemingway

Paper & subject code:- American literature 

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar 

Date of Submission:- 26 March, 2023

• Abstract:

"For Whom the Bell Tolls" by Ernest Hemingway is a literary masterpiece renowned for its distinctive narrative style, which combines minimalist prose, stream-of-consciousness techniques, and objective realism to depict the harrowing realities of the Spanish Civil War. This research paper delves into the narrative intricacies of Hemingway's novel, examining its minimalist approach to storytelling, dialogue-driven exposition, and temporal structure. Through a close analysis of narrative perspective, symbolism, and pacing, the paper elucidates how Hemingway's narrative choices contribute to the novel's thematic depth and emotional resonance. By exploring the interplay of past and present, as well as the novel's narrative closure, this paper seeks to shed light on the enduring impact of Hemingway's narrative style on the literary landscape. Through textual evidence and critical analysis, it offers new insights into the complexities of "For Whom the Bell Tolls" and its exploration of war, sacrifice, and existentialism.

• Introduction: 

Ernest Hemingway's "For Whom the Bell Tolls" stands as a seminal work of twentieth-century literature, celebrated for its gripping portrayal of the Spanish Civil War and its exploration of timeless themes such as love, sacrifice, and the human condition. Central to the novel's enduring legacy is Hemingway's distinctive narrative style, which eschews ornate language in favor of a sparse, minimalist prose that resonates with raw emotional power. At the heart of Hemingway's narrative style lies a commitment to objective realism, rejecting sentimentality and romanticism in favor of unflinching honesty and authenticity. Through concise and straightforward prose, Hemingway plunges readers into the tumultuous world of war-torn Spain, distilling complex emotions and experiences into their purest essence. This minimalist approach heightens the novel's emotional impact and resonance, allowing Hemingway to illuminate the harsh realities of conflict and the human capacity for endurance and resilience. Furthermore, Hemingway's narrative technique is distinguished by its adept use of dialogue as a primary vehicle for exposition and character development. Through authentic and evocative dialogue, Hemingway breathes life into his characters, revealing them through their words and interactions. As we delve deeper into the narrative complexities of "For Whom the Bell Tolls," we explore the interplay of past and present, the novel's temporal structure, and its symbolic richness. Through textual analysis and critical interpretation, we uncover the deeper layers of meaning embedded within Hemingway's sparse yet evocative prose, shedding new light on the enduring relevance of this literary classic and offering insights into the complexities of human experience and the eternal struggle for meaning in a world fraught with conflict and uncertainty.

• About writer:

Ernest Hemingway (born July 21, 1899, Cicero [now in Oak Park], Illinois, U.S.—died July 2, 1961, Ketchum, Idaho) was an American novelist and short-story writer, awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1954. He was noted both for the intense masculinity of his writing and for his adventurous and widely publicized life. His succinct and lucid prose style exerted a powerful influence on American and British fiction in the 20th century.

The first son of Clarence Edmonds Hemingway, a doctor, and Grace Hall Hemingway, Ernest Miller Hemingway was born in a suburb of Chicago. He was educated in the public schools and began to write in high school, where he was active and outstanding, but the parts of his boyhood that mattered most were summers spent with his family on Walloon Lake in upper Michigan. On graduation from high school in 1917, impatient for a less-sheltered environment, he did not enter college but went to Kansas City, where he was employed as a reporter for the Star. He was repeatedly rejected for military service because of a defective eye, but he managed to enter World War I as an ambulance driver for the American Red Cross. On July 8, 1918, not yet 19 years old, he was injured on the Austro-Italian front at Fossalta di Piave. Decorated for heroism and hospitalized in Milan, he fell in love with a Red Cross nurse, Agnes von Kurowsky, who declined to marry him. These were experiences he was never to forget.

Famous works: 

• “A Clean Well-Lighted Place”
•  “A Farewell to Arms” 
• “A Moveable Feast”
•  “Across the River and Into the Trees” 
• “Death in the Afternoon” 
• “For Whom the Bell Tolls” 
• “Green Hills of Africa” 
• “Hills like White Elephants” 
• “In Our Time” 
• “Islands in the Stream” 
• “The Fifth Column”
•  “The Old Man and the Sea” 
• “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber” 
• “The Snows of Kilimanjaro”
•  “The Sun Also Rises” 
• “To Have and Have Not”

Iceberg theory: 

The Iceberg Theory, championed by Ernest Hemingway, revolutionized narrative technique by advocating for the power of understatement and omission in storytelling. This theory, also known as the theory of omission, suggests that the deeper meanings of a story should remain implicit rather than explicit, akin to the majority of an iceberg lying beneath the surface of the water. Hemingway's writing style epitomized this approach, characterized by simplicity, directness, and an economy of language. Through his minimalist prose, he left much unsaid, allowing readers to infer deeper themes and meanings through subtext, symbolism, and the subtle interactions between characters. Short, declarative sentences, sparse description, and a focus on essentials were hallmarks of his style, inviting readers to actively engage with the text and fill in the gaps with their own interpretations. By trusting in the power of what is left unsaid, Hemingway believed his stories could achieve greater depth and resonance, influencing generations of writers and shaping the trajectory of modernist and minimalist literature.

• Minimalist Narrative Technique: 

Hemingway's minimalist narrative technique in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" is emblematic of his larger literary aesthetic, marked by concise and direct prose that eschews unnecessary embellishments. Throughout the novel, Hemingway employs a straightforward writing style, conveying complex emotions and experiences with economy and precision. By omitting superfluous details and focusing on the essentials, he creates a narrative that is both immersive and impactful, drawing readers into the world of war-torn Spain with stark clarity. This minimalist approach not only reflects Hemingway's commitment to honesty and authenticity but also allows for a deeper exploration of the novel's themes and characters. Through sparse yet evocative language, Hemingway captures the essence of human experience, inviting readers to contemplate the profound truths hidden within the simplicity of his prose.

• Stream-of-Consciousness: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway skillfully employs a stream-of-consciousness technique to delve into the inner workings of the protagonist, Robert Jordan. Through this narrative approach, readers are granted intimate access to Jordan's internal landscape, witnessing his thoughts, emotions, and inner conflicts in real-time. As Jordan grapples with the complexities of war and the intricacies of personal relationships, the stream-of-consciousness technique provides a direct conduit to his psyche, allowing readers to experience his fears, doubts, and reflections with a heightened sense of immediacy and authenticity. By immersing readers in Jordan's stream of thought, Hemingway creates a powerful sense of empathy and connection, inviting readers to navigate the turbulent currents of Jordan's mind alongside him. This narrative device not only adds depth and complexity to Jordan's character but also enriches the novel's exploration of themes such as duty, sacrifice, and existentialism, revealing the profound impact of war on the human psyche.

Example, 

"And then as he looked, the whole scene of the place he had left came to his eyes and he looked for it with pity and he went on across the field. I must be careful, he thought. And I must plan my position and how to destroy these bridges. Now it is a success. We have reached there. There is much more to do."

Here, we observe Jordan's thoughts shifting rapidly between his observations of the battlefield and his strategic planning. The stream-of-consciousness technique allows readers to witness the fluidity of Jordan's thinking process, as he transitions seamlessly between his immediate surroundings and his larger objectives. This internal monologue provides insight into Jordan's strategic mindset and his determination to accomplish his mission despite the challenges ahead.

• Objective Realism: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway's commitment to objective realism is evident throughout the narrative. The prose is devoid of sentimentality or romanticism, presenting events and characters in a raw and unembellished manner. This approach serves to enhance the novel's authenticity and credibility, immersing readers in the harsh realities of the Spanish Civil War. For example, when describing scenes of battle or violence, Hemingway's language is stark and matter-of-fact, devoid of any glorification or embellishment. Similarly, his portrayal of characters is characterized by a keen attention to detail and nuance, presenting them as flawed and complex individuals rather than idealized heroes or villains. By eschewing sentimentality and romanticism, Hemingway creates a narrative that feels grounded in reality, inviting readers to confront the brutality and chaos of war without any filters or illusions. This objective realism not only adds depth and authenticity to the novel but also underscores its exploration of themes such as sacrifice, honor, and the human capacity for resilience in the face of adversity.

• Dialogue-driven Narrative: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway's dialogue-driven narrative is a prominent feature, driving much of the story's exposition and character development. Throughout the novel, Hemingway utilizes dialogue as a primary vehicle for conveying information, revealing the intricacies of character relationships, and advancing the plot. His dialogue is characterized by its authenticity and economy, with each exchange serving a distinct purpose in moving the narrative forward. For example, in the interactions between Robert Jordan and other characters, such as Pilar or Pablo, Hemingway expertly reveals nuances of personality, motivation, and conflict through their conversations. Additionally, Hemingway's dialogue often reflects the rhythms and cadences of natural speech, lending further authenticity to the characters and their interactions. By relying on dialogue to convey essential information and deepen characterizations, Hemingway creates a narrative that is both efficient and rich in detail, immersing readers in the world of war-torn Spain while also illuminating the complexities of human relationships and emotions.

"I have a method," said Pablo. "But it is my method, and I will not tell it to anyone."

"Because it is not a method," Robert Jordan said. "Because it is a lack of method and it is the way you like to do things."

This exchange between Robert Jordan and Pablo illustrates their differing approaches to warfare and strategy, with Robert Jordan challenging Pablo's reluctance to share information.

• Temporal Structure: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway's meticulous attention to temporal structure is evident in the novel's compressed timeframe, which spans only a few days yet encompasses a vast array of experiences and emotions. Despite the brevity of the narrative timeline, Hemingway skillfully weaves together multiple storylines and character arcs, immersing readers in the urgent and volatile atmosphere of war-torn Spain. By compressing the timeframe, Hemingway intensifies the impact of pivotal events and decisions, heightening the sense of urgency and immediacy that permeates the story. This temporal compression not only enhances the novel's narrative pacing but also underscores its thematic exploration of time, mortality, and the fleeting nature of human existence. Through his meticulous attention to temporal detail, Hemingway invites readers to contemplate the profound implications of each passing moment, as characters grapple with the consequences of their actions in the face of uncertainty and upheaval.

• Narrative Perspective: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway employs a third-person limited narrative perspective, primarily focusing on the thoughts and experiences of Robert Jordan, the protagonist. This narrative choice allows readers to intimately empathize with Jordan's perspective, immersing themselves in his inner thoughts, emotions, and struggles. By maintaining a degree of narrative distance, Hemingway also provides insight into the motivations and actions of other characters, enriching the story with multiple viewpoints and perspectives. This narrative technique allows readers to develop a nuanced understanding of the novel's characters and their relationships, while also providing a broader context for the events unfolding in war-torn Spain. Through the lens of Robert Jordan's perspective, readers are invited to explore themes of duty, sacrifice, and existentialism, while also gaining insight into the complexities of human nature and the moral dilemmas inherent in war. Overall, Hemingway's third-person limited narrative perspective in "For Whom the Bell Tolls" enhances the reader's engagement with the story, fostering empathy for the protagonist while offering a multifaceted exploration of the novel's themes and characters.

• Pacing and Rhythm:

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway's narrative style is characterized by deliberate pacing and a rhythmic cadence that mirror the fluctuations of warfare and the emotional tumult experienced by the characters. Throughout the novel, the prose ebbs and flows with the tension of the plot, creating a dynamic and immersive reading experience. Hemingway's use of short, declarative sentences and sparse description contributes to the novel's pacing, propelling the story forward with a sense of urgency and intensity. Additionally, the rhythmic cadence of the prose reflects the ebb and flow of the characters' emotions, from moments of quiet introspection to bursts of action and conflict. By modulating the pace and rhythm of the narrative, Hemingway captures the visceral reality of war and the psychological toll it takes on the characters, drawing readers deeper into the novel's world. This careful attention to pacing and rhythm enhances the novel's impact, allowing readers to feel the pulse of the story as it unfolds and immersing them in the emotional journey of its characters.

Example,

"There was a pine tree that she saw that would have to be cut. Then they would go back to the cave and make the breakfast. The sunlight was on the tree now and the wind was in it and it made a sound of something moving alive and as she watched it she saw it could be the wind that was blowing, rising, and that could be going on now as it was going on yesterday."

In this passage, Hemingway's prose moves with a deliberate rhythm, mirroring the calm and methodical actions of the characters as they plan their day. The repetition of phrases like "There was a pine tree" and "she saw" creates a sense of continuity and routine, while the imagery of the wind in the pine tree adds a naturalistic element to the scene. Hemingway's use of short, simple sentences contributes to the overall pacing of the passage, capturing the steady progression of time and the characters' contemplative mood. Through his careful attention to pacing and rhythm, Hemingway immerses readers in the sensory experience of the moment, evoking a sense of tranquility and anticipation amidst the backdrop of war.

Interplay of Past and Present: 

Throughout "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway masterfully intertwines past and present experiences, blurring the boundaries between memory and immediate reality. This narrative technique enriches the story by adding layers of depth and complexity, illuminating the interconnectedness of individual lives and historical events. For example, as Robert Jordan navigates the challenges of his mission in the present, he is often haunted by memories of his past, including his experiences in the Spanish Civil War and his relationships with other characters. These flashbacks provide context for Jordan's actions and motivations, deepening readers' understanding of his character and the larger historical context in which the novel is set. Additionally, Hemingway's seamless transitions between past and present events create a sense of continuity and inevitability, suggesting that the past is always present in shaping the course of human lives and destinies. Through the interplay of past and present, Hemingway invites readers to contemplate the cyclical nature of history and the enduring impact of individual choices on the fabric of time.

Example,

"He remembered the time he had hooked one of a pair of big trout in the Navarre fishing and it had been so big that he had not been able to move it and had played it for hours before he had finally taken it, and it had been dark when he had taken it."

In this passage, Robert Jordan recalls a past experience of fishing in Navarre. This memory surfaces in the midst of his current mission, highlighting the interplay between past and present in his mind. The memory is vivid and detailed, suggesting its significance to Jordan's character and psyche. Hemingway's incorporation of this flashback adds depth to Jordan's character, providing insight into his past experiences and interests. Additionally, the memory serves as a brief respite from the tension of the present moment, offering a glimpse into Jordan's inner world and the complexity of his thoughts and emotions. Through this interplay of past and present, Hemingway enriches the narrative with layers of meaning and nuance, inviting readers to explore the interconnectedness of individual experiences and the passage of time.

• Narrative Closure: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway's narrative style plays a crucial role in crafting a powerful sense of closure. Through his masterful control of language and structure, Hemingway brings together the disparate threads of the story in a poignant and resonant conclusion. As the narrative reaches its climax, Hemingway carefully resolves the conflicts and tensions that have been building throughout the novel, providing closure for the characters and the reader alike. The simplicity and directness of Hemingway's prose contribute to the novel's sense of finality, leaving readers with a profound sense of catharsis and contemplation. By skillfully tying up loose ends and offering moments of resolution and reflection, Hemingway ensures that the novel's conclusion lingers in the reader's mind long after the final page has been turned. Through his narrative closure, Hemingway invites readers to reflect on the themes and ideas explored in the novel, fostering a deeper understanding of the human experience and the complexities of war and love.

• Conclusion: 

In "For Whom the Bell Tolls," Hemingway employs a multifaceted narrative approach that intricately weaves together various techniques to craft a powerful and immersive reading experience. Through his minimalist narrative style, characterized by succinct prose and the omission of superfluous details, Hemingway captures the raw essence of the Spanish Civil War with unflinching honesty. Simultaneously, he delves into the innermost thoughts and emotions of protagonist Robert Jordan, utilizing a stream-of-consciousness technique to provide readers with intimate access to Jordan's internal conflicts and reflections. This narrative intimacy is complemented by Hemingway's commitment to objective realism, stripping away sentimentality and presenting events and characters in a stark and unembellished manner. Furthermore, Hemingway's dialogue-driven narrative and deliberate pacing imbue the story with authenticity and urgency, while his skillful manipulation of temporal structure and interplay of past and present experiences add layers of depth and complexity to the narrative. Ultimately, Hemingway's narrative closure brings together these disparate threads in a poignant and resonant conclusion, leaving readers with a profound sense of catharsis and contemplation. Through his masterful control of language and structure, Hemingway invites readers to reflect on the interconnectedness of individual lives and historical events, offering a compelling exploration of the human experience amidst the backdrop of war and love.

• Refrences: 

• McGilvary, Evander Bradley. “The Stream of Consciousness.” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, vol. 4, no. 9, 1907, pp. 225–35. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010813. Accessed 25 Apr. 2024.
• MENG, WANG, and Michael S. Duke. “An Open Letter on ‘Stream-of-Consciousness.’” Modern Chinese Literature, vol. 1, no. 1, 1984, pp. 25–28. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41490564. Accessed 25 Apr. 2024.
• Soteriou, Matthew. “Content and the Stream of Consciousness.” Philosophical Perspectives, vol. 21, 2007, pp. 543–68. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25177214. Accessed 25 Apr 2024.
• VOINOVICH, VLADIMIR, and John Jamieson. “Stream of Consciousness.” New Zealand Slavonic Journal, 2003, pp. 165–69. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40922151. Accessed 25 Apr 2024.

Thank you so much.....

Have a great time.

Word count: 3352

Images: 3

107:The Twentieth Century: From World War ll to the End of the Century.(22393)

Representation of Id, Ego and Super Ego in "Waiting For Godot"

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 107- The Twentieth Century: From World War ll to the End of the Century.(22393) , Sem - 2, 2024.

Topic: Representation of Id , Ego and Super Ego in "Waiting For Godot "

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 2 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number:  24

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:-  Representation of Id , Ego and Super Ego in "Waiting For Godot"

Paper & subject code:- The Twentieth Century: From World War ll to the End of the Century.(22393)

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar 

Date of Submission:- 26 March, 2023

Abstract

This paper explores the representation of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic concepts of the id, ego, and superego in Samuel Beckett's iconic play, "Waiting for Godot." Through a psychoanalytic lens, the characters and themes in the play are analyzed to reveal the underlying psychological dynamics at play. The id, characterized by primal instincts and desires, is manifested in the impulsive actions and existential yearnings of Vladimir and Estragon, the two central characters. The ego, serving as a mediator between the id and external reality, is depicted in their attempts to navigate their absurd existence and maintain a semblance of control. Additionally, the superego, representing societal norms and moral conscience, is explored through the characters' interactions and internal struggles with guilt, shame, and responsibility. By examining the interplay of these psychic forces within the characters and their relationships, this paper uncovers deeper insights into the existential themes of absurdity, futility, and human nature in "Waiting for Godot." Through this analysis, it becomes evident that Beckett's portrayal of the human psyche reflects the universal struggles and existential dilemmas inherent in the human condition.

Introduction : 

Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot" stands as a seminal work in 20th-century literature, renowned for its exploration of existential themes and profound philosophical inquiries into the nature of human existence. While the play's enigmatic plot and minimalist setting have sparked diverse interpretations, one lens through which its complexity can be unraveled is Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic theory. At its core, Freud's psychoanalytic theory posits that the human psyche is comprised of three distinct but interconnected components: the id, the ego, and the superego. The id represents primal instincts and desires, operating at the unconscious level and driving individuals to seek immediate gratification. In contrast, the ego serves as a mediator between the id and external reality, striving to balance instinctual urges with societal norms and constraints. Finally, the superego embodies moral conscience and internalized societal standards, exerting influence over behavior through feelings of guilt, shame, and adherence to moral principles. By applying this psychoanalytic framework to "Waiting for Godot," we gain deeper insights into the psychological motivations and conflicts driving the characters' actions and interactions. Through close analysis of the play's characters, themes, and narrative structure, we uncover layers of meaning that speak to the universal human experience and the existential dilemmas inherent in the human condition. In this paper, we will embark on a journey into the existential abyss of "Waiting for Godot," exploring how Beckett utilizes Freudian concepts to illuminate the inner workings of the human psyche. Through an examination of key characters such as Vladimir and Estragon, as well as supporting characters like Pozzo and Lucky, we will delve into the representation of the id, ego, and superego within the play. By exploring the interplay of these psychic forces and their impact on the characters' existential plight, we aim to uncover deeper truths about the human condition and the search for meaning in a seemingly absurd world.

• About Writer :

Samuel Beckett

Samuel Beckett (born April 13?, 1906, Foxrock, County Dublin, Ireland—died December 22, 1989, Paris, France) was an author, critic, and playwright, winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1969. He wrote in both French and English and is perhaps best known for his plays, especially En attendant Godot (1952; Waiting for Godot). Samuel Beckett was born in a suburb of Dublin. Like his fellow Irish writers George Bernard Shaw, Oscar Wilde, and William Butler Yeats, he came from a Protestant, Anglo-Irish background. At the age of 14 he went to the Portora Royal School, in what became Northern Ireland, a school that catered to the Anglo-Irish middle classes.

From 1923 to 1927, he studied Romance languages at Trinity College, Dublin, where he received his bachelor’s degree. After a brief spell of teaching in Belfast, he became a reader in English at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris in 1928. There he met the self-exiled Irish writer James Joyce, the author of the controversial and seminally modern novel Ulysses, and joined his circle. Contrary to often-repeated reports, however, he never served as Joyce’s secretary. He returned to Ireland in 1930 to take up a post as lecturer in French at Trinity College, but after only four terms he resigned, in December 1931, and embarked upon a period of restless travel in London, France, Germany, and Italy. In 1937 Beckett decided to settle in Paris. (This period of Beckett’s life is vividly depicted in letters he wrote between 1929 and 1940, a wide-ranging selection of which were first published in 2009.)

As a citizen of a country that was neutral in World War II, he was able to remain there even after the occupation of Paris by the Germans, but he joined an underground resistance group in 1941. When, in 1942, he received news that members of his group had been arrested by the Gestapo, he immediately went into hiding and eventually moved to the unoccupied zone of France. Until the liberation of the country, he supported himself as an agricultural labourer. In 1945 he returned to Ireland but volunteered for the Irish Red Cross and went back to France as an interpreter in a military hospital in Saint-Lô, Normandy. In the winter of 1945, he finally returned to Paris and was awarded the Croix de Guerre for his resistance work.

• Introduction to Psychoanalytic Theory:

Psychoanalytic theory, pioneered by Sigmund Freud, revolutionized our understanding of human psychology in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. At its core, Freud's theory delves into the depths of the unconscious mind to unravel the complexities of human behavior, motivations, and personality development. Central to Freud's psychoanalytic framework are three fundamental components of the psyche: the id, the ego, and the superego.

The id represents the most primal aspect of the psyche, operating purely on instinctual drives and desires. It resides in the unconscious mind and seeks immediate gratification of basic needs and impulses, regardless of societal norms or consequences. Freud likened the id to a reservoir of psychic energy, constantly striving to fulfill primal urges such as hunger, thirst, and sexual gratification.

In contrast, the ego serves as the conscious, rational part of the psyche, mediating between the demands of the id, the constraints of external reality, and the moral standards imposed by the superego. The ego operates on the reality principle, seeking to satisfy the id's desires in ways that are both socially acceptable and realistic. It employs defense mechanisms such as repression, denial, and rationalization to manage inner conflicts and maintain psychological equilibrium.

The superego, often referred to as the moral conscience, embodies internalized societal norms, values, and moral standards. It develops through socialization and upbringing, internalizing parental and societal expectations, as well as cultural and religious influences. The superego acts as a moral censor, evaluating the ego's actions and motives against a set of idealized standards, and punishing deviations with feelings of guilt, shame, or anxiety.

Together, the id, ego, and superego form a dynamic, often conflictual, interplay that shapes individual personality and behavior. Freud's psychoanalytic theory has had a profound impact on psychology, psychiatry, and psychotherapy, influencing our understanding of human development, mental illness, and therapeutic techniques. Moreover, Freud's concepts of the id, ego, and superego continue to resonate in fields beyond psychology, including literature, philosophy, and cultural studies, offering valuable insights into the complexities of the human condition.

• Use of psychoanalytic theory as a tool for analyzing literary texts:

Psychoanalytic theory serves as a powerful tool for interpreting literary texts by delving into the depths of characters' psyches, unraveling subconscious motivations, and uncovering hidden desires. Through the lens of Freudian psychology, characters, themes, and narrative structures in literature can be analyzed to reveal underlying psychological conflicts, symbolism, and representations of the id, ego, and superego. Characters become embodiments of psychological forces, with their actions and relationships reflecting unconscious drives and desires. Themes such as sexuality, repression, and existential angst emerge as central motifs, echoing Freud's theories of human behavior and development. Additionally, narrative structures, including symbolism, dream sequences, and stream-of-consciousness techniques, offer insights into characters' inner worlds and the workings of the unconscious mind. Overall, the application of psychoanalytic theory to literature enriches our understanding of texts by illuminating the complex interplay between conscious and unconscious forces, and by shedding light on the universal truths and existential dilemmas inherent in the human condition.

Analysis of Characters in "Waiting for Godot":

In "Waiting for Godot," Samuel Beckett crafts characters that serve as embodiments of Freudian psychological concepts, each reflecting different facets of the human psyche. Vladimir and Estragon, the two central characters, can be seen as representing contrasting aspects of the psyche according to Freudian theory. Vladimir embodies elements of the ego, displaying rationality, consciousness, and a sense of responsibility as he navigates their uncertain predicament and attempts to maintain order in their existence. In contrast, Estragon exhibits qualities more aligned with the id, displaying impulsivity, instinctual desires, and a propensity for immediate gratification as he grapples with existential angst and the futility of their situation. Additionally, supporting characters like Pozzo and Lucky also embody elements of the id, ego, and superego. Pozzo, with his authoritarian demeanor and imposition of societal norms, represents the superego, while Lucky, with his submissive obedience and repression of individual desires, reflects aspects of the id. Together, these characters form a complex psychological landscape that mirrors the inner conflicts and dynamics of the human psyche, inviting readers to contemplate the universal struggles and existential questions inherent in the human condition.

• The Id:                                                                                                  

In "Waiting for Godot," aspects of characters' behavior and desires closely align with Freud's concept of the id, representing primal instincts and desires that drive individuals to seek immediate gratification without regard for consequences. Vladimir and Estragon frequently exhibit impulsive behaviors throughout the play, such as their incessant waiting for Godot, despite uncertainty about his arrival. Their impatience and eagerness for immediate satisfaction reflect the id's insistence on fulfilling instinctual needs without consideration for rationality or long-term consequences. Moments such as Estragon's constant demands for food and Vladimir's fixation on existential questions further illustrate the characters' primal desires for gratification, highlighting themes of desire, hunger, and survival in the play. The characters' preoccupation with basic needs and their relentless pursuit of fulfillment underscore the id's role in shaping their actions and driving the narrative forward, ultimately reflecting the existential struggles and primal instincts inherent in the human condition.                                                                                              

In example ,

Estragon: (impatiently) "Let's go."

Vladimir: "We can't."

Estragon: "Why not?"

Vladimir: "We're waiting for Godot."

In this exchange, Estragon's impatience and insistence on leaving immediately without any rational reason or consideration for their current situation reflects the impulsive nature of the id. Despite Vladimir's attempt to explain their purpose of waiting for Godot, Estragon's focus is solely on his immediate desire to leave, highlighting the id's emphasis on instant gratification and disregard for consequences or rationality. This conversation showcases how the characters' actions and motivations in the play often align with Freud's concept of the id, emphasizing primal instincts and impulsive behavior.

• The Ego :

In "Waiting for Godot," the ego functions as a crucial mediator between the characters' primal instincts represented by the id and the external world, characterized by their existential predicament and the uncertainties surrounding their waiting for Godot. Vladimir and Estragon's interactions and attempts to navigate their circumstances illustrate the ego's role in balancing inner desires with external realities. Despite their existential plight and the absurdity of their situation, both characters demonstrate a persistent effort to maintain a sense of identity and agency. Vladimir, often taking on a more rational and pragmatic stance, represents the ego's attempts to make sense of their situation and find meaning in their existence. Estragon, on the other hand, embodies the ego's struggle with inner conflicts and the search for coherence in a seemingly meaningless world. Their ongoing dialogue and interactions reflect the ego's ongoing battle for control and coherence, as they grapple with existential questions and attempt to reconcile their inner desires with external circumstances. Ultimately, Vladimir and Estragon's efforts to maintain a semblance of identity and agency amidst their existential predicament highlight the ego's pivotal role in shaping their responses to the challenges of their existence.

Pozzo and Lucky also exemplify aspects of the ego, albeit in different ways compared to Vladimir and Estragon. Pozzo, as the master figure, represents a more dominant and authoritarian manifestation of the ego. He exerts control over Lucky, his submissive servant, and imposes his will upon others, reflecting the ego's desire for power and control in the external world. Pozzo's demeanor and actions illustrate the ego's attempt to assert dominance and maintain a sense of superiority in the face of existential uncertainties.

On the other hand, Lucky embodies a different facet of the ego, albeit in a more subdued manner. Despite his apparent subservience to Pozzo, Lucky demonstrates a degree of agency and autonomy, particularly through his occasional outbursts of speech and moments of rebellion. His silent compliance and obedience to Pozzo may be interpreted as a form of egoic adaptation to external authority, reflecting the ego's capacity to navigate power dynamics and adapt to challenging circumstances.

In Example ,

Vladimir: "We're waiting for Godot."

Estragon: "Ah! (despairingly). You're sure it was here?"

Vladimir: "What?"

Estragon: "That we were to wait."

Vladimir: "He said by the tree. Do you see any others?"

Estragon: "What is it?"

Vladimir: "I don't know. A willow."

Estragon: "Where are the leaves?"

Vladimir: "It must be dead."

In this conversation, Vladimir and Estragon demonstrate a sense of rationality and logic, reflecting elements of the ego. Despite their existential predicament and uncertainty about Godot's arrival, Vladimir attempts to maintain coherence and order by reminding Estragon of their purpose for waiting. Also in the case of Lucky and Pozzo . 

Pozzo: "Good day!"

Vladimir: "Good day."

Estragon: "Good day."

Pozzo: "I am Pozzo."

Vladimir: "Not at all."

Pozzo: "The same."

Estragon: "The same?"

Pozzo: "Pozzo."

Vladimir: "Ah! (politely) Mr. Albert?"

Pozzo: "Pozzo."

Vladimir: "Pozzo! (cordially) A pleasure."

Estragon: "Pleased to meet you."

Pozzo: "The pleasure is mine. (to Vladimir) Would you be good enough to tell me what time it is?"

Vladimir: "The time?"

Pozzo: "Yes, the time."

Vladimir: "What time?"

Pozzo: "What time? (vaguely irritated) What time do you make it?"

Vladimir: "What?"

Pozzo: "The time of day."

Vladimir: "(looking at the sun) It doesn't seem to be quite day or night."

In this exchange, Pozzo displays a sense of authority and superiority, asserting his presence and expecting deference from Vladimir and Estragon. Despite their confusion and uncertainty, Vladimir and Estragon maintain a polite demeanor in response to Pozzo's inquiries, reflecting a sense of social propriety and egoic adaptation to external authority.

• The Super Ego:                                                       

In "Waiting for Godot," elements of the superego are reflected in the characters' adherence to societal norms, moral standards, and internalized values, despite the absence of external authority figures. Vladimir and Estragon, as well as Pozzo and Lucky, each demonstrate aspects of the superego in their own distinct ways.

Vladimir and Estragon exhibit a sense of moral conscience and responsibility in their interactions and decisions throughout the play. Despite their existential predicament and the absurdity of their situation, they adhere to their self-imposed task of waiting for Godot, suggesting a deeply ingrained sense of duty and obligation. Their discussions about morality, ethics, and the consequences of their actions reflect an internalized set of values and societal norms, indicating the influence of the superego on their perceptions of right and wrong.

Pozzo, as the authoritarian figure, embodies elements of the superego through his imposition of societal norms and expectations on others. He asserts control over Lucky, his submissive servant, and expects deference and obedience from Vladimir and Estragon. Pozzo's rigid adherence to social hierarchies and power dynamics reflects a sense of moral superiority and entitlement, highlighting the influence of the superego on his behavior and interactions with others.

Lucky, in contrast, represents a more subdued manifestation of the superego, characterized by his silent compliance and obedience to Pozzo's commands. Despite his apparent subservience, Lucky demonstrates moments of introspection and moral deliberation, suggesting an internal struggle between his own desires and external expectations. His occasional outbursts of speech and moments of rebellion hint at a deeper conflict between individual autonomy and societal constraints, underscoring the complexities of the superego and its impact on his identity and agency.                                                                                                                                                                              

Vladimir: "We'll hang ourselves tomorrow. (Pause.) Unless Godot comes."

Estragon: "And if he comes?"

Vladimir: "We'll be saved."                                                                                                                      

In this exchange, Vladimir and Estragon's discussion about hanging themselves reflects their adherence to a societal expectation of waiting for Godot and the hope that his arrival will save them from their existential despair. Despite the absurdity of their situation, their commitment to this plan demonstrates a sense of moral conscience and responsibility, suggesting the influence of the superego in their decision-making.                                                          

Pozzo: "You don't respond?"

Lucky: (silence)

Pozzo: "I order you to speak!"

Lucky: (begins a nonsensical monologue)

Here, Pozzo's authoritarian command and Lucky's obedient response illustrate the power dynamics at play between them. Pozzo's imposition of authority and expectation of compliance reflect a sense of moral superiority and entitlement, while Lucky's silent compliance and subsequent outburst of speech suggest an internal struggle between his own desires and external expectations, highlighting the complexities of the superego and its impact on his behavior.

• Interplay of the Id, Ego, and Superego:                                                                      

In "Waiting for Godot," the dynamic interplay between the id, ego, and superego within individual characters and their relationships with each other is central to the existential themes of the play. Characters such as Vladimir and Estragon embody these psychic forces, with Vladimir representing the ego's rationality and attempt to maintain coherence in their absurd situation, while Estragon embodies the id's impulses and desires for immediate gratification. The superego, represented through societal norms and moral standards, is subtly present in the characters' adherence to waiting for Godot, despite the lack of concrete evidence of his existence or arrival. Conflicts between these psychic forces drive the characters' actions and decisions throughout the play, manifesting in moments of tension, frustration, and existential despair. Vladimir and Estragon's ongoing debate about whether to wait for Godot or take action reflects the ego's struggle to balance instinctual desires with societal expectations and rational considerations. Meanwhile, Pozzo and Lucky's master-servant relationship highlights the power dynamics at play between the id's impulses and the superego's imposition of authority and control. The absence of resolution or growth in "Waiting for Godot" reflects existential themes of absurdity and futility, as the characters' efforts to find meaning or purpose in their existence are repeatedly thwarted by the inherent uncertainties of their situation. Despite their attempts to assert agency or control, they ultimately find themselves trapped in a cycle of waiting and uncertainty, unable to escape the existential dilemmas that define their existence. This sense of futility and despair underscores the absurdity of the human condition and the inherent struggles between the id, ego, and superego in navigating the complexities of life.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot" offers a compelling exploration of the Freudian concepts of the id, ego, and superego, illuminating the complexities of the human psyche within an existential framework. Through the characters of Vladimir, Estragon, Pozzo, and Lucky, Beckett portrays the intricate interplay between primal instincts, rationality, and internalized moral standards, reflecting the eternal struggle between desire, reason, and societal norms. The characters' existential predicament and futile attempts to find meaning underscore the absurdity of the human condition, highlighting the perpetual conflict between the id's impulses for immediate gratification, the ego's efforts to maintain coherence, and the superego's imposition of moral standards. Ultimately, "Waiting for Godot" serves as a profound meditation on the human experience, offering insights into the complexities of identity, agency, and the search for significance in a seemingly indifferent universe. Through its exploration of the id, ego, and superego, Beckett's masterpiece invites readers to confront fundamental questions about existence, morality, and the nature of reality, leaving an indelible impression on the psyche long after the final curtain falls.

• Refrences:

• Halloran, Stephen M. “THE ANTI-AESTHETICS OF ‘WAITING FOR GODOT.’” The Centennial Review, vol. 16, no. 1, 1972, pp. 69–81. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23740461. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

• Peters, R. S. “Freud’s Theory.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 7, no. 25, 1956, pp. 4–12. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/685932. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.

• Sarnoff, Irving. “Psychoanalytic Theory and Social Attitudes.” The Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, 1960, pp. 251–79. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2746405. Accessed 26 Apr. 2

024.

Thank you so much.....

Have a great time .

WORDS COUNT: 3543

IMAGES : 5