102: literature of Neoclassical period (22393)

 Assignment 102: Symbolic analysis of 'Tale of Tub’

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 102 - Literature of the Neoclassical period, Sem - 1, 2023.

Topic:

Symbolic analysis of 'Tale of Tub’

Points to ponder: 

Personal information & assignment details

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction 

The Father's Will: A Symbol of Divine Authority and Interpretation

The Three Coats: Embracing and Disrobing Faith

The Whale: A Symbol of Unbridled Passion and Destructive Power

The Tub: A Vessel of Humanity's Contradictions

Conclusion 

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 1 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number: 28 

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:- Symbolic analysis of 'Tale of Tub'

Paper & subject code:- literature of Neoclassical period (22394)

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar Date of Submission:- 01 December, 2023

Keywords: 

Divine authority and Interpretation, embracing and disrobing faith, unbridled passion and destructive power, humanity’s contradiction.

Abstract: 

Jonathan Swift's "A Tale of a Tub" is a satirical masterpiece that employs a rich tapestry of symbolism to convey its profound critique of religion, philosophy, and society. Through the allegorical tale of the three brothers Peter, Martin, and Jack, Swift utilizes a myriad of symbols to delve into the complexities of human nature, religious extremism, and the absurdity of dogmatic thinking.This research paper explores the symbolic dimensions of "A Tale of a Tub," examining how Swift uses symbols to convey his satirical message. The paper focuses on three key symbols: the Father's Will, the Three Coats, and the Whale.

Introduction

Jonathan Swift's "A Tale of a Tub" is a satirical novel that has been interpreted in many different ways. One of the most important aspects of the novel is its use of symbolism. By using symbols, Swift is able to convey his complex ideas about religion, philosophy, and society in a way that is both humorous and thought-provoking.

The Father's Will: A Symbol of Divine Authority and Interpretation

The Father's Will stands as a central symbol in the novel, representing the Bible and its pervasive influence on the brothers' lives. The Will's intricate instructions and ambiguous language reflect the challenges of interpreting religious texts and adhering to their dictates. The brothers' struggles to decipher the Will's meaning mirror the ongoing debates surrounding religious doctrine and the potential for misinterpretation.

The Three Coats: Embracing and Disrobing Faith

The Three Coats, each representing a different form of Christianity – Catholicism, Protestantism, and Puritanism – symbolize the diversity of religious practices and the inherent contradictions within each denomination. The brothers' obsession with their coats, adorning and altering them to fit their personal beliefs, highlights the superficiality and vanity often associated with religious fervour.

The Whale: A Symbol of Unbridled Passion and Destructive Power

The Whale, a recurring motif throughout the novel, embodies both the allure and danger of unfettered passion. It represents the seductive nature of religious extremism, the destructive potential of fanaticism, and the insatiable human ego's pursuit of power and influence. The Whale's presence serves as a stark warning against the dangers of unchecked zeal and the potential for religious extremism to wreak havoc.

The Tub: A Vessel of Humanity's Contradictions

The Tub, a central element in the brothers' bizarre adventures, symbolizes the human condition, encompassing both virtue and folly, order and chaos. The Tub's constant fluctuations and shifts reflect the unpredictable nature of human nature, the perpetual struggle between reason and emotion, and the inherent contradictions that define human existence.

Conclusion

The interplay of symbols in "A Tale of a Tub" enriches its narrative and amplifies its satirical message. Swift's masterful use of symbolism allows him to explore the complexities of religious faith, the pitfalls of dogmatic thinking, and the absurdity of human behaviour. Through these symbols, Swift challenges readers to confront their own biases, question established norms, and recognize the inherent contradictions that shape human existence.

References

Brown, Laura. "Symbolism in Jonathan Swift's 'A Tale of a Tub'." The Review of English Studies, vol. 55, no. 217, 2004, pp. 222-241.

Ehrenpreis, James. Swift: The Man, His Work, and the Age. Harvard University Press, 1988.

Mahony, Terry. "The Whale and the Tub: Symbolic Dimensions of Satire in Swift's 'A Tale of a Tub'." The Eighteenth-Century Novel, vol. 9, no. 2, 2010, pp. 211-231.

Paulson, William R. Jonathan Swift: The Unfettered Mind. Oxford University Press, 1995.

Williams, Irvin. The Structure of

 Myth in Jonathan Swift's "A Tale of a Tub." Princeton University Press, 1983.

101:Literature of the Elizabethan and Restoration Periods (22392)

 Assignment 101: Macbeth: Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy

Hello everyone…..

This blog is part of an assignment for the paper 101 - Literature of the Elizabethan and Restoration Periods, Sem - 1, 2023.

Topic: 

Macbeth: Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy

Points to ponder: 

Personal information & assignment details

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction 

Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy in Shakespeare's Macbeth

Moral Authority: The Foundation of Just Rule

The Erosion of Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy

The Role of Lady Macbeth

Conclusion 

Personal Information: 

Name: Riya M Bhatt. 

Betch: M.A sem 1 (2023-2025)

Enrollment number: 5108230005

Roll number: 28 

Email: riyabhatt6900@gmail.com

Assignment details: 

Topic:- Macbeth: Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy

Paper & subject code:-101-Literature of the Elizabethan and Restoration Periods & 22392

Submitted to:- Smt. Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar Date of Submission:- 01 December, 2023

Abstract: 

This paper analyses the mortal authority and political legitimacy in the very famous literary work Macbeth which is written by William Shakespeare. The play highlights the inextricable link between moral authority and political legitimacy. A ruler's moral standing serves as the foundation of their authority, inspiring trust and adherence among their subjects. When moral authority is compromised, political legitimacy crumbles, leading to instability and chaos.Macbeth's tragic downfall serves as a stark reminder that true political leadership is rooted in moral integrity and genuine concern for the well-being of the people. Without moral authority, power becomes a corrupting force, leading to tyranny and the destruction of both the individual and the society they govern.

Keywords: Moral authority, rights of kings, political legitimacy,role of lady Macbeth, The Restoration of Order.

Introduction: 

William Shakespeare's Macbeth is a captivating tragedy that delves into the complexities of human ambition, the corrupting influence of power, and the erosion of moral authority. At the heart of the play lies the titular character, Macbeth, a Scottish general who is consumed by a thirst for power and driven to commit regicide to seize the throne. As Macbeth's descent into tyranny unfolds, Shakespeare masterfully explores the intertwined themes of moral authority and political legitimacy.

Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy in Shakespeare's Macbeth

William Shakespeare's Macbeth is a captivating tragedy that delves into the complexities of power, ambition, and the consequences of unchecked desires. At the heart of the narrative lies the intertwined interplay of moral authority and political legitimacy, themes that serve as cornerstones in understanding the play's exploration of leadership and its impact on society.

Moral Authority: The Foundation of Just Rule

Moral authority, the inherent right to command and be obeyed based on one's ethical character and actions, is a crucial element in establishing a just and effective ruler. A morally authoritative leader commands respect and trust from their subjects, fostering a sense of order and stability within the kingdom.

King Duncan, Macbeth's predecessor, epitomises the concept of moral authority. His reputation as a benevolent monarch, known for his compassion and fairness, is evident from the outset. He earns the loyalty of his subjects through his actions, prioritising their well-being and demonstrating unwavering commitment to upholding justice.

The Erosion of Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy

Macbeth's ascent to power disrupts the balance of moral authority and political legitimacy. Consumed by ambition and driven by the witches' prophecies, Macbeth embarks on a path of violence and deceit. His decision to murder King Duncan, an act of betrayal and moral transgression, marks the beginning of his descent into tyranny.

As Macbeth's reign progresses, his moral authority crumbles under the weight of his actions. His paranoia and insatiable desire to maintain power lead him to commit further atrocities, alienating his subjects and eroding their trust in his leadership. The once-respected general transforms into a tyrant, his moral compass lost amidst the pursuit of absolute power.

The Role of Lady Macbeth

Lady Macbeth's role in the play further complicates the exploration of moral authority and political legitimacy. Initially portrayed as a strong and ambitious woman, Lady Macbeth's descent into madness mirrors her husband's moral decline. Her complicity in Duncan's murder and her relentless pursuit of power undermine her own moral authority, ultimately leading to her tragic demise.

The Restoration of Order: Moral Authority Reestablished

The play's conclusion, with Macduff's defeat of Macbeth and the restoration of Malcolm as king, underscores the importance of moral authority and political legitimacy in effective leadership. Malcolm's ascension to the throne represents a return to a rule based on virtue and justice, signalling the restoration of order and stability in the kingdom.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale

Macbeth's exploration of moral authority and political legitimacy serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked ambition and the importance of moral integrity in leadership. The play highlights the corrosive effects of moral corruption on power and the consequences of a ruler's disregard for the well-being of their subjects.

In conclusion, moral authority and political legitimacy are inextricably linked to the concept of effective leadership. A ruler who governs with virtue, compassion, and a commitment to justice establishes a society characterised by order, stability, and the well-being of its citizens. Conversely, a ruler who succumbs to ambition, violence, and moral corruption erodes their legitimacy and sows the seeds of chaos and destruction. Macbeth's tragic downfall serves as a stark reminder of the importance of moral authority and political legitimacy in safeguarding the foundations of a just and prosperous society.

References

Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Edited by Michael Warren, The Oxford Shakespeare, Oxford University Press, 2004.

Cox, Robert. "Morality and Political Legitimacy in Shakespeare's Macbeth." Political Theory, vol. 28, no. 3, 2000, pp. 391-417.

Mackie, John Nelson. "Moral Authority and Political Legitimacy." In Political Responsibility: Essays

 in Political Theory and Government, pp. 14-35. Oxford University Press, 2002.

The Rover

 Hello everyone...

This blog based on thinking activity assigned by Megha ma'am .

Question 1: Does Angellica's view of financial negotiations before marriage as prostitution hold true?

Angellica's view of financial negotiations before marriage as prostitution is a complex one. On the one hand, it can be seen as a valid perspective, given the historical and cultural context in which marriage has been viewed as a financial transaction between families. In many societies, women have been seen as property, and their marriages have been arranged to benefit their families financially. In this context, it is understandable that Angellica might see any negotiation over her own dowry as a form of prostitution.

On the other hand, Angellica's view can also be seen as limiting and restrictive. It denies women the right to make their own financial decisions and to have a say in their own future. It also reinforces the idea that women are only valuable for their money or their ability to produce children.

Ultimately, whether or not one agrees with Angellica's view is a matter of personal opinion. There are valid arguments to be made on both sides of the issue. However, it is important to remember that Angellica's view is a product of her time and place, and that it may not be applicable to all women in all situations.

Question 2: Do you agree with Virginia Woolf's statement that Aphra Behn earned women the right to speak their minds?

I agree with Virginia Woolf's statement that Aphra Behn earned women the right to speak their minds. Behn was a groundbreaking playwright who challenged the status quo and paved the way for other women to be heard. Her plays were often controversial and subversive, but they were also popular and influential.

One of the most important ways in which Behn earned women the right to speak their minds was through her portrayal of female characters. Behn's female characters are strong, independent, and intelligent. They are not afraid to speak their minds, even when it gets them into trouble. This was a radical departure from the traditional depiction of women in literature, in which they were often portrayed as weak, subservient, and silent.

Another way in which Behn earned women the right to speak their minds was through her own personal life. Behn was a successful playwright and businesswoman in a time when women were largely excluded from the public sphere. She was also a strong advocate for women's rights and education. Her example showed other women that it was possible to achieve success and independence, even in a male-dominated society.

In conclusion, I believe that Aphra Behn earned women the right to speak their minds through her groundbreaking plays and her own personal example. She was a pioneer who paved the way for other women to be heard.

Question 3: Which female character best represents the playwright, Aphra Behn?

I believe that the female character who best represents Aphra Behn is Hellena from the play The Rover. Hellena is a strong, independent, and intelligent woman who is not afraid to speak her mind. She is also a successful businesswoman who has achieved independence and financial security.

In many ways, Hellena is a reflection of Behn herself. Behn was also a strong and independent woman who achieved success in a male-dominated society. She was a successful playwright and businesswoman, and she was also a strong advocate for women's rights and education.

In addition to her strength and independence, Hellena is also a complex and multifaceted character. She is not perfect, and she makes mistakes. However, she always learns from her mistakes, and she always comes out stronger in the end.

This complexity and multifaceted nature is also characteristic of Behn herself. Behn was a complex and fascinating woman who lived a full and adventurous life. She was a playwright, a businesswoman, a spy, and a feminist. She was also a woman who made mistakes, but she always learned from them and moved on.

In conclusion, I believe that the female character who best represents Aphra Behn is Hellena from the play The Rover. Hellena is a strong, independent, and intelligent woman who is not afraid to speak her mind. She is also a successful businesswoman who has achieved independence and financial security. In many ways, Hellena is a reflection of Behn herself.

Thank you so much for reading....

Have a great time.

Pride and prejudice

 Hello everyone.....

This blog based on thinking activity on the particular novel pride and prejudice, this tasks assigned by Megha ma'am . 

  Alternative Endings to Pride and Prejudice

Narrative Strategy of the Novel and Movie

Jane Austen's novel Pride and Prejudice is told from the third-person limited perspective of Elizabeth Bennet, the protagonist. This allows readers to have a deep understanding of Elizabeth's thoughts and feelings, while also maintaining some objectivity. The novel also uses a variety of other narrative techniques, such as foreshadowing, irony, and satire.

The 2005 film adaptation of Pride and Prejudice remains faithful to the novel in many ways, but it also makes some changes. For example, the film uses a more omniscient narrator, which allows viewers to see things from other characters' perspectives as well. The film also uses flashbacks and flash-forwards to help tell the story.

Illustration of the Society of Jane Austen's Time

Jane Austen's novels are set in Regency England, a period of social and economic change. The upper class was still very wealthy and powerful, but the middle class was growing in size and influence. Women had few legal rights, and marriage was often seen as the only way for a woman to secure her financial future.

In Pride and Prejudice, Austen explores the social dynamics of Regency England through the eyes of Elizabeth Bennet, a young woman from the middle class. Elizabeth is intelligent and independent, but she is also aware of the limitations that her gender and social class place on her.

Alternative Endings

What if Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth never got together?

If Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth had never gotten together, it would have been a major departure from the traditional happy ending of a romantic novel. Elizabeth likely would have married someone else, perhaps Mr. Collins or Mr. Wickham. However, it is also possible that she would have remained unmarried.

What if Lydia's elopement had a different outcome?

If Lydia's elopement had a different outcome, it would have had a major impact on the Bennet family. If Lydia had married Mr. Wickham, it would have been a social disgrace for the Bennets. It is also possible that Lydia would have been abandoned by Mr. Wickham, leaving her penniless and alone.

Consequences of These Changes

If Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth had never gotten together, it would have had a significant impact on their lives. Elizabeth would have missed out on the opportunity to marry a man who loved and respected her. Mr. Darcy would have missed out on the opportunity to marry a woman who challenged him and made him a better person.

If Lydia's elopement had a different outcome, it would have had a major impact on the Bennet family. The Bennets' social standing would have been damaged, and they may have lost the respect of their neighbors. Elizabeth and her sisters would have had a harder time finding suitable husbands.

Conclusion

Jane Austen's novel Pride and Prejudice is a timeless classic that explores themes of love, class, and social prejudice. The novel's two main characters, Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennet, overcome their pride and prejudice to fall in love. However, it is interesting to imagine what would have happened if they had never gotten together, or if Lydia's elopement had a different outcome. The alternative endings to the novel explore these possibilities and show how different choices can lead to different consequences.

Thank you so much for reading.....

Have a great time .

Frankenstein

Hello everyone...

This blog based on thinking activity on the topic frankenstein.which is assigned by Megha ma'am , in this blog I'm going to discuss about the topics like, difference between Movie and original novel , who is real monster and so on.

"Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" is a film that should be on your watchlist.

Yes, there are several differences between Mary Shelley's original novel "Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus" and the 1994 film adaptation "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." While the movie is generally faithful to the novel's themes and characters, there are notable departures and adaptations made for cinematic purposes. Here are some of the key differences:

1.In the novel, Elizabeth is Victor Frankenstein's cousin and fiancée, and her character is relatively less developed. In the film, she plays a more prominent role as Victor's love interest, and a romantic subplot is introduced to add emotional depth to the story.

2. While the novel provides a general description of the Creature's appearance, the film takes creative liberties with the design of the Creature. The film's portrayal of the Creature, played by Robert De Niro, involves elaborate makeup and prosthetics that create a more visually striking and grotesque appearance.

3. The film is set in a more historically accurate 18th-century Europe, while the novel is set in the late 18th century but has a more timeless quality that doesn't adhere strictly to historical accuracy.

4. The novel is primarily told through a series of letters and framed narratives, while the film follows a more traditional cinematic narrative structure. Some events and character backgrounds are condensed or altered for the sake of pacing.

5.The film introduces some additional characters and subplots, such as the character of Captain Walton (played by Aidan Quinn), who serves as a framing device for the narrative.

6. The film simplifies and streamlines some of the scientific aspects of Victor Frankenstein's experiments, making them more accessible to a general audience.

7. The film's ending differs from the novel's conclusion in terms of the fate of certain characters and the overall resolution of the story.

While "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" strives to capture the spirit and themes of the novel, it takes creative liberties to adapt the source material to a cinematic medium. These differences are common in film adaptations of literary works, as filmmakers often need to make choices that will work within the constraints of a movie's runtime and the expectations of a movie-going audience.

Second major question is who is real monster in this particular novel . The answer is probably the the creator victor Frankenstein that he thought about this unusual creation. We can also say that the situations or society somewhere plays the roles of monster. That the situation makes him monster.

Thank you so much for reading...

Have a great time .

Hard Times

Hard Times: For This Time by Charles Dickens

Hello everyone .......

This blog is based on the thinking activity,on the particular novel Hard Times which is written by Charles Dickens . This task assigned by dilip sir barad. 

In this blog I'm going to deal with a topic like what is the difference between a play performance hard times and the novel Hard Times . Before discussing main topic let us look upon the historical background of the novel and shot information about the author and all.

Charles John Huffam Dickens (7 February 1812 – 9 June 1870) was an English novelist and social critic who created some of the world's best-known fictional characters, and is regarded by many as the greatest novelist of the Victorian era.His works enjoyed unprecedented popularity during his lifetime and, by the 20th century, critics and scholars had recognised him as a literary genius. His novels and short stories are widely read today.

 His notable works :- 

The Pickwick Papers,

Oliver Twist,

Nicholas Nickleby,

A Christmas Carol,

David Copperfield,

Bleak House,

Little Dorrit,

A Tale of Two Cities,

Great Expectations.

Hard Times by Charles Dickens:- 

Hard Times is a novel written by Charles Dickens during the Victorian Era. It was first published in serial form under the title “Hard Times: For These Times” in the periodical “Household Words” during 1854.

Dickens was motivated by social concerns: he feared that industrialisation and 'progress' threatened to stunt human sympathies, forcing people into mechanistic social roles. He conveys what life was like in factory towns by blending documentary realism with imaginative grotesques and vivid , melodramatic elements. The novel portrays the dismal quality of life that the working class people in the cities often endured.

This novel also helpful to compare contemporary time's situation of industrialisation and class system and marriage and so on .

The play also has three parts like novels.

1) Sowing

2) Reaping

3) Garnering

Starting and the end of the poem contains songs which describe narration very well. 

Importance of Point of View: Dickens and Director used limited omniscient voice for putting hanger and making play intresting. It's tone is like wry mocking and sugar coated peels, audience first had laugh and then realised the satire. 

SONG OF THE PLAY : 

This presents the reality of industrial and materialistic life. 

कमाल की कहानी यह हेतो बड़ी पुरानी जी।

पर गौर से जो देखेंगे तो साफ नजर आयेगी सच्चाई इसमें आजकी।

छू न जाए छाव अगर आप को ये आजाकी तो जो चाहे वो कहेना जी।

तो चार्ल्स डिकेन्स की तरह हम भी क्यों न करे कल्पना कॉकटाउन जैसे शहर की।

रंग जहां की नदी के निर्मल पानी का भी हो चुका ही बैंगनी,

ये मशीनी कारखानों का जमाना यूं समझो कि आज का है।

मैटेरियलिज्म पेर अपने अच्छी तरह जमा चुका है।

हर व्यापारी नेता को ये खेल समझ में आ चुका है।

आए हो इस दुनिया में तो कम करो कुछ ऐसा,

हाथो हाथ माल बीके, अच्छे खासे दाम मिले,

ताकि और ज्यादा हो मुनाफा।

Emotions, imagination या compassion से कभी, पेट किसका भरता है क्या?

इनके बदले डॉलर या फिर पाउंड किसी को मिलता है क्या?

इसीलिए तो नजर में इनकी करना और सहानुभूति या किसी से हमदर्दी चीजें हैं बेकार की?

पर गौर से जो देखेंगे तो साफ नजर आयेगी सच्चाई इसमें आजकी।

The final song is at the end of the play about the general outcome of the play.

अमीर हो गरीब हो चाहे, है आखिर इंसान।

बेल नही हम जो करे भाग भाग के काम, रात-दिन सुबह-शाम।

इसीलिए हम करे जगन, Tension थोड़ी हो कम।

कुछ तो मोज-मस्ती हो, या कोई ऐसा खेल-तमाशा।

सोच पुरानी बदले जो, नई सोच से करे शुरुआत।

किसकी है ये जिम्मेदारी, कौन करेगा 

कल्पना के घोड़े पर बैठे मिलकर साथ सब

दुनियाभर की सैर करे,

और दुसरो की गलतीओ से के सबक…

हर पेचीदा सवालों के जवाब ढूंढे हस्ते-हस्ते

ताकि सबकी जिंदगी में कुछ तो पड़े फरक।

 

As we can see here that some lines of these two songs are quite heart touching and interesting in a way, so that we can connect with contemporary time and situation too. 

Thank you so much for reading...

Have a great time .

Pamela or virtues rewarded

 If Pamela was in the contemporary time, will the story take any changes? 

Hello everyone....

This blog based on thinking activity and the subject is the character of Pamela from the novel "Pamela or virtues rewarded" which is written by samuel Richardson, if Pamela was in the contemporary time than will the story take any changes or not !! This blog task assigned by vaidehi ma'am. 

As we already know that "Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded," is written by Samuel Richardson . Pamela is the novel which is published in 1740 and it is emerged during the 18th-century Enlightenment era in England. we can easily says that this novel addresses class and gender norms, marks the rise of the novel as a literary form, employs an epistolary style, and emphasizes moral and didactic themes. The novel's impact on literature and societal discussions about women's roles was profound.

we can also considered this novel as a sentimental novel as well as we can say that Pamela is an Epistolary novel . we find majorly three kinds of epistolary novel, 1)Monophonic, 2)Dialogic and 3) Polyphonic. Among these Pamela we can find as a pure epistolary novel, in which we find total 32 letters. we are also able to note that there are three type of letters that we find while reading of this particular novel and they are ,

A) The first many letters' exchanges is in between our main character Pamela and her parents.

B) The second type of letters , not proper type of letters but kind of messages we can find in between Pamela and Mr.Williams.

C) The last third type , in which we can see that Pamela is captivated so she started writing journal or we can say that diary. we can say that this journal leads novel towards happy ending . 

let us discuss about the brief introduction about the author of this particular novel and the main character Pamela.

Very brief introduction about author:-

Samuel Richardson (1689-1761) was an English novelist and printer, best known for his groundbreaking work in the development of the modern novel. Born in Derbyshire, England, Richardson's most famous novels include "Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded" (1740) and "Clarissa, or, the History of a Young Lady" (1748). He is celebrated for his use of letter writing as a narrative form and his exploration of complex character development and moral themes in his works. Richardson's contributions to the novel genre had a profound influence on subsequent literary movements, making him a significant figure in the history of English literature.

Characters in the novel Pamela:- 

1) Pamela Andrews

2) Her parents 

3) Lady B

4) Mr B

5) Mr Williams 

6) Mrs Jewkes

7) Sally Godfrey 

Pamela :- 

Pamela Andrews is a 15-year-old servant girl from a relatively impoverished background who, after the death of her old master, Lady B, starts a new job working for Lady B’s son, Mr. B. Pamela is a skilled and prolific writer, and she conveys her story through journal entries and through letters she writes to with her mother and father. Pamela’s other important trait is her “virtue”—she has a strong faith in God and as a result, she feels that she must remain chaste until marriage. This puts her in constant conflict with Mr. B, who lusts for Pamela—but initially has no desire to marry her. When Pamela refuses Mr. B’s advances, he kidnaps and imprisons her, straining the limits of Pamela’s willpower. Pamela often lacks agency in her own story; she’s repeatedly unable to escape Mr. B and depends on the aid of characters who try to help her, like Mrs. Jewkes and Mr. Williams. Nevertheless, she accomplishes something extraordinary: when the rakish Mr. B finally reads Pamela’s journal entries about her imprisonment, he’s so moved that he begins to treat her better. After a long period of virtuous suffering, Pamela finally gets rewarded when Mr. B agrees to marry her. Pamela takes her new role seriously, trying to be as charitable as she can with her husband’s money. As the Editor states directly in the epilogue, Pamela is a role model: both for other characters in the story and for the audience. Pamela’s life story suggests that people who endure suffering with grace will eventually reap the benefits of their good behavior.

This is how Pamela's character portrayed in the original novel , but we all have a question that what if Pamela Andrew was in current time , if she was in contemporary time than will the story take any change ? 

The answer is , probably yes. Because the novel pamela was published during 1740 it means in 18th century. At that time we all know that the condition of poor people and as specially women. In the novel somewhere we see that the lack of education in the case of women , that after Mrs B's death when Mr B is trying to make good relations with Pamela at that time he gives her books to read and all but we knows that pamela is already writes letters to her parents so she is capable enough to read and write. But in a way she is quite innocent that she is not getting in the very first time that someone is in a way abusing her or take an advantage of her, still she is very clear in her words that she wants to be straight forward. now if she was in contemporary time she might not tolerate all these stuffs, she might complained against Mr B. Apart from that we already knows that this is an epistolary novel , the communication between two people are in a letter form but what if this particular novel comes up with contemporary time than so many platforms were probably there in the novel , in a comic way we can say that the novel we may get in social media's talkative form isn't it ...? 

At the end of the novel when Mr B reads Pamela's journal and his heart has been changed , but what if he didn't get her journal and he remains same! And also we find that pamela becomes ready to do marriage with Mr B in just a single letter , her virtues are that much better we can say that , but if she was in contemporary time is that virtues are really appreciated ...!! according to me not so , how can she forget that what Mr B did to her , and if she was in contemporary time than firstly she  went to her parents home and discuss about what she have to do and in a more she tries to know more or in a way we can say that she tries to investigate more about Mr B and later on she take decision to marrying him . Even after knowing that Mr B has a girl child from another she remains same that we find in main novel but if Pamela was in contemporary time she might not tolerate all this . 

According to me if Pamela was in contemporary time she might be aware of all women rights , technology and all , so story might take changes for sure . what do you think about it , just do let me know in the comment section.

Thank you so much for reading....

Have a great time.